Faculté de Médecine, Département de Kinésiologie, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Sociale (Cirris) du CIUSSS de la Capitale Nationale, Quebec, QC G1M 2S8, Canada.
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 26;22(17):6432. doi: 10.3390/s22176432.
For individuals with altered sensory cues, vibrotactile feedback improves their balance control. However, should vibrotactile feedback be provided every time balance control is compromised, or only one-third of the time their balance is compromised? We hypothesized that vibrotactile feedback would improve balance control more when provided every time their balance is compromised. Healthy young adults were randomly assigned to two groups: group 33% feedback (6 males and 6 females) and group 100% feedback (6 males and 6 females). Vibrotactile feedbacks related to the body's sway angle amplitude and direction were provided, while participants stood upright on a foam surface with their eyes closed. Then, we assessed if balance control improvement lasted when the vibrotactile feedback was removed (i.e., post-vibration condition). Finally, we verified whether or not vibrotactile feedback unrelated to the body's sway angle and direction (sham condition) altered balance control. The results revealed no significant group difference in balance control improvement during vibrotactile feedback. Immediately following vibrotactile feedback, both groups reduced their balance control commands; body sway velocity and the ground reaction forces variability decreased. For both groups, unrelated vibrotactile feedback worsened balance control. These results confirmed that participants processed and implemented vibrotactile feedback to control their body sways. Less vibrotactile feedback was effective in improving balance control.
对于感觉线索改变的个体,振动触觉反馈可以改善其平衡控制。然而,在平衡控制受到干扰时,振动触觉反馈应该每次都提供,还是仅在三分之一的时间提供?我们假设,当每次平衡受到干扰时提供振动触觉反馈,将更有效地改善平衡控制。健康的年轻成年人被随机分配到两组:33%反馈组(6 名男性和 6 名女性)和 100%反馈组(6 名男性和 6 名女性)。当参与者闭眼站在泡沫表面上时,提供与身体摆动角度幅度和方向相关的振动触觉反馈。然后,我们评估当去除振动触觉反馈(即振动后条件)时,平衡控制改善是否持续。最后,我们验证了与身体摆动角度和方向无关的振动触觉反馈(假条件)是否会改变平衡控制。结果表明,在振动触觉反馈期间,两组在平衡控制改善方面没有显著差异。在振动触觉反馈之后,两组都减少了平衡控制指令;身体摆动速度和地面反作用力变异性降低。对于两组,无关的振动触觉反馈都使平衡控制恶化。这些结果证实,参与者处理和实施振动触觉反馈来控制身体的摆动。较少的振动触觉反馈可以有效地改善平衡控制。