Erasmus University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, B2-127, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017 May;14(5):294-303. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.12. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
The optimal duration and type of antiplatelet therapy after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (DES) remains uncertain. At the time of the first-in-man implantation of the sirolimus DES in 1999, the protocol-defined dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration was only 2 months. Subsequently, DAPT duration was extended to 1 year on the basis of anecdotal historical data, and this practice was then incorporated into clinical guidelines. For >1 decade, trialists have sought to compare the safety and efficacy of abbreviated (<6 months) and prolonged (>12 months) DAPT regimens. However, the body of evidence is limited by the heterogeneity of end points, time of randomization, and bleeding criteria used in each trial. Pharmaceutical advances led to the introduction of new ADP-receptor antagonists, which are thought to be more effective than clopidogrel. The ADP-receptor antagonists moved the focus from the optimal duration of DAPT to the potential efficacy of single antiplatelet therapy after DES implantation. In this Review, we summarize the current evidence on the duration of DAPT and the risk of bleeding and adverse cardiac events after DES implantation, and describe the pitfalls of trial interpretation. The ongoing, prospective trials to test single antiplatelet therapy after DES implantation are also discussed.
经药物洗脱支架(DES)植入后,抗血小板治疗的最佳持续时间和类型仍不确定。在 1999 年首例西罗莫司 DES 植入时,方案规定的双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)持续时间仅为 2 个月。随后,基于轶事历史数据将 DAPT 持续时间延长至 1 年,此后这一做法被纳入临床指南。10 多年来,试验人员一直试图比较缩短(<6 个月)和延长(>12 个月)DAPT 方案的安全性和疗效。然而,由于每个试验终点、随机化时间和出血标准的异质性,证据有限。药物学的进步促使新型 ADP 受体拮抗剂问世,它们被认为比氯吡格雷更有效。ADP 受体拮抗剂将重点从 DAPT 的最佳持续时间转移到 DES 植入后单药抗血小板治疗的潜在疗效上。在这篇综述中,我们总结了关于 DAPT 持续时间以及 DES 植入后出血和不良心脏事件风险的现有证据,并描述了试验解释的陷阱。还讨论了正在进行的、前瞻性的 DES 植入后单药抗血小板治疗试验。