Suppr超能文献

一项针对急性精神科病房住院患者尊严量表有效性的初步研究。

A preliminary study of Patient Dignity Inventory validation among patients hospitalized in an acute psychiatric ward.

作者信息

Di Lorenzo Rosaria, Cabri Giulio, Carretti Eleonora, Galli Giacomo, Giambalvo Nina, Rioli Giulia, Saraceni Serena, Spiga Giulia, Del Giovane Cinzia, Ferri Paola

机构信息

Mental Health Department, Service of Psychiatric Diagnosis and Treatment in NOCSAE General Hospital.

Private Accredited Psychiatric Hospital villa Igea, Modena.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Jan 23;13:177-190. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S122423. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the perception of dignity among patients hospitalized in a psychiatric setting using the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI), which had been first validated in oncologic field among terminally ill patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After having modified two items, we administered the Italian version of PDI to all patients hospitalized in a public psychiatric ward (Service of Psychiatric Diagnosis and Treatment of a northern Italian town), who provided their consent and completed it at discharge, from October 21, 2015 to May 31, 2016. We excluded minors and patients with moderate/severe dementia, with poor knowledge of Italian language, who completed PDI in previous hospitalizations and/or were hospitalized for <72 hours. We collected the demographic and clinical variables of our sample (n=135). We statistically analyzed PDI scores, performing Cronbach's alpha coefficient and principal factor analysis, followed by orthogonal and oblique rotation. We concomitantly administered to our sample other scales (Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression and Anxiety, Global Assessment of Functioning and Health of the Nation Outcome Scales) to analyze the PDI concurrent validity.

RESULTS

With a response rate of 93%, we obtained a mean PDI score of 48.27 (±19.59 SD) with excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient =0.93). The factorial analysis showed the following three factors with eigenvalue >1 (Kaiser's criterion), which explained >80% of total variance with good internal consistency: 1) "Loss of self-identity and social role", 2) "Anxiety and uncertainty for future" and 3) "Loss of personal autonomy". The PDI and the three-factor scores were statistically significantly positively correlated with the Hamilton Scales for Depression and Anxiety but not with other scale scores.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary research suggests that PDI can be a reliable tool to assess patients' dignity perception in a psychiatric setting, until now little investigated, helping professionals to improve quality of care and patients to accept treatments.

摘要

目的

使用患者尊严量表(PDI)调查精神科住院患者的尊严感,该量表最初在肿瘤领域的晚期患者中得到验证。

患者与方法

在修改了两个项目后,我们于2015年10月21日至2016年5月31日,将意大利语版的PDI应用于一家公立精神科病房(意大利北部一个城镇的精神科诊断与治疗服务机构)的所有住院患者,这些患者均表示同意并在出院时完成了该量表。我们排除了未成年人、患有中度/重度痴呆症、意大利语知识欠佳、在之前住院时已完成PDI以及住院时间少于72小时的患者。我们收集了样本(n = 135)的人口统计学和临床变量。我们对PDI得分进行了统计分析,计算了克朗巴哈α系数并进行主因子分析,随后进行正交和斜交旋转。我们同时对样本应用了其他量表(汉密尔顿抑郁与焦虑评定量表、功能总体评定量表和国家健康结果量表)以分析PDI的同时效度。

结果

应答率为93%,我们获得的PDI平均得分为48.27(标准差±19.59),内部一致性极佳(克朗巴哈α系数 = 0.93)。因子分析显示了以下三个特征值大于1的因子(凯泽准则),它们解释了总方差的80%以上,内部一致性良好:1)“自我认同和社会角色的丧失”,2)“对未来的焦虑和不确定性”,3)“个人自主性的丧失”。PDI及其三个因子得分与汉密尔顿抑郁与焦虑量表在统计学上呈显著正相关,但与其他量表得分无关。

结论

我们的初步研究表明,PDI可以作为评估精神科环境中患者尊严感的可靠工具,此前该领域对此研究甚少,它有助于专业人员提高护理质量并帮助患者接受治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30cd/5279815/70e5f5b3d2a8/ndt-13-177Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验