Jenewein Josef, Moergeli Hanspeter, Meyer-Heim Tatjana, Muijres Peter, Bopp-Kistler Irene, Chochinov Harvey M, Peng-Keller Simon
Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 24;12:795813. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.795813. eCollection 2021.
Dementia is the major cause for disability and dependence in older people and associated with considerable psychological burden. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of Dignity Therapy, a brief psychotherapeutic intervention to enhance dignity and reduce psychological burden, in patients with early stage dementia and in their families or close friends. In this randomized, waitinglist-controlled clinical trial a total of 54 patients with new diagnosis of early stage dementia and 54 study partners (spouses: = 37; relatives: = 14; close friends: = 3) were randomly assigned to immediate treatment ( = 28) or delayed treatment ( = 26) after 3 months waiting. The main outcomes were feasibility: proportion of screened and invited patients who consented participation; Acceptability: number of drop-outs, and satisfaction with treatment; Efficacy: psychological burden (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-HADS), quality of life (WHOQOL-Bref), and sense of dignity (Patient Dignity Inventory-PDI). In total 38.6% of all eligible patients ( = 140) consented and were enrolled. Along the study six participants (11.1%) dropped out. Patients' satisfaction with the treatment was high and with no significant difference between the groups. HADS scores were significantly lower in both groups at the 3-months follow-up (immediate group: mean difference = -2.69, SE = 0.85, = 0.003; delayed group: mean difference = -1.97, SE = 0.89, = 0.031). There was no significant group by time interaction effect ( = 0.71; df = 2, 70.3; = 0.50). PDI scores only decreased significantly (i.e., improvement of dignity) in the immediate group (mean difference = -6.56, SE = 1.63, < 0.001; delayed group: mean difference = -3.01, SE = 1.69, = 0.081), but the group by time interaction effect was not statistically significant ( = 2.29; df = 1, 46.8; = 0.14). Quality of life improved in some respects by the treatment, but the immediate and the delayed group did not differ significantly over time. After pooling patients' data of both groups, Dignity Therapy resulted in significant improvements in almost all outcome measures. Patients' family members/close friends reported high satisfaction with the intervention. Our findings suggest that Dignity Therapy is feasible and highly accepted in patients with early stage dementia. Patients reported significant improvements, however, there was no significant effect of the intervention in the immediate treatment group compared to the delayed group.
痴呆症是老年人残疾和依赖他人的主要原因,并且会带来相当大的心理负担。本研究的目的是确定尊严疗法(一种旨在提升尊严并减轻心理负担的简短心理治疗干预措施)对早期痴呆症患者及其家人或亲密朋友的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效。在这项随机、等待名单对照的临床试验中,共有54名新诊断为早期痴呆症的患者和54名研究伙伴(配偶:37名;亲属:14名;亲密朋友:3名)在等待3个月后被随机分配到立即治疗组(28名)或延迟治疗组(26名)。主要结局指标包括:可行性:筛查并邀请的同意参与的患者比例;可接受性:退出人数以及对治疗的满意度;疗效:心理负担(医院焦虑抑郁量表-HADS)、生活质量(世界卫生组织生活质量简表-WHOQOL-Bref)和尊严感(患者尊严量表-PDI)。所有符合条件的患者(共140名)中,总计38.6%(54名)同意并被纳入研究。在整个研究过程中,有6名参与者(11.1%)退出。患者对治疗的满意度较高,两组之间无显著差异。在3个月的随访中,两组的HADS评分均显著降低(立即治疗组:平均差值=-2.69,标准误=0.85,P=0.003;延迟治疗组:平均差值=-1.97,标准误=0.89,P=0.031)。时间与分组之间不存在显著的交互作用(F=0.71;自由度=2,70.3;P=0.50)。仅立即治疗组的PDI评分显著降低(即尊严得到改善)(平均差值=-6.56,标准误=1.63,P<0.001;延迟治疗组:平均差值=-3.01,标准误=1.69,P=0.081),但时间与分组的交互作用无统计学意义(F=2.29;自由度=1,46.8;P=0.14)。治疗在某些方面改善了生活质量,但立即治疗组和延迟治疗组随时间推移并无显著差异。合并两组患者的数据后,尊严疗法在几乎所有结局指标上均有显著改善。患者的家庭成员/亲密朋友对该干预措施满意度较高。我们的研究结果表明,尊严疗法对早期痴呆症患者是可行且高度可接受的。患者报告有显著改善,然而,与延迟治疗组相比,立即治疗组并未显示出干预的显著效果。