Service de Dermatologie, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
EA 7379, EpiDermE, UPEC Université Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Oct;177(4):978-986. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15377. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
Low-dose (i.e. ≤ 30 mg per week) methotrexate is widely prescribed by dermatologists. However, there is limited evidence-based information regarding the relative risk of and determinants for adverse events associated with this treatment. The aims of this review were to assess the relative risk of and the determinants for adverse events associated with low-dose methotrexate exposure. A systematic review was undertaken using the MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases. Randomized controlled trials comparing low-dose methotrexate with placebo were eligible. Random effect meta-analyses were conducted to assess the risk ratios (RRs) of adverse events associated with methotrexate exposure. Subgroup analyses and random effect meta-regressions were performed to examine the determinants of adverse events. In total, 68 trials (6938 participants) were included. Compared with placebo, low-dose methotrexate slightly increased the risk of adverse events (mean number per individual: 1·78 ± 2·00 in the methotrexate group, 1·53 ± 1·89 in the placebo group; P < 0·001), including nausea/vomiting, elevated transaminase levels, mucosal ulcerations, leucopenia, thrombopenia and infectious events, but not the risk of serious adverse events or death. Low-dose methotrexate also increased the number of withdrawals from studies because of adverse events [RR 1·32 (1·13-1·53)]. The concomitant prescription of folic/folinic acid was associated with a significant lower risk of any adverse events, and methotrexate prescribed orally was associated with a higher risk of abdominal pain than when prescribed subcutaneously or by intramuscular injection. On the other hand, the risk of adverse events did not increase with the weekly dose or with duration of exposure. Similar studies comparing methotrexate with other systemic/biological treatments are needed.
低剂量(即每周≤30 毫克)甲氨蝶呤被皮肤科医生广泛开处。然而,关于与这种治疗相关的不良事件的相对风险和决定因素,证据有限。本综述的目的是评估与低剂量甲氨蝶呤暴露相关的不良事件的相对风险和决定因素。使用 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CENTRAL 数据库进行了系统评价。比较低剂量甲氨蝶呤与安慰剂的随机对照试验符合条件。进行随机效应荟萃分析以评估与甲氨蝶呤暴露相关的不良事件的风险比(RR)。进行亚组分析和随机效应元回归以检查不良事件的决定因素。总共纳入了 68 项试验(6938 名参与者)。与安慰剂相比,低剂量甲氨蝶呤略微增加了不良事件的风险(甲氨蝶呤组中每个人的平均不良事件数:1.78±2.00,安慰剂组中为 1.53±1.89;P<0.001),包括恶心/呕吐、转氨酶升高、黏膜溃疡、白细胞减少症、血小板减少症和感染性事件,但不包括严重不良事件或死亡的风险。低剂量甲氨蝶呤还增加了因不良事件而退出研究的人数[RR 1.32(1.13-1.53)]。同时开具叶酸/亚叶酸的处方与任何不良事件的风险显著降低相关,而口服甲氨蝶呤与腹痛风险增加相关,而皮下或肌内注射则风险降低。另一方面,不良事件的风险不会随着每周剂量或暴露时间的增加而增加。需要进行比较甲氨蝶呤与其他全身/生物治疗的类似研究。