Suppr超能文献

淡水苔藓虫的触手结构。

Tentacle structure in freshwater bryozoans.

作者信息

Tamberg Yuta, Shunatova Natalia

机构信息

Department of Invertebrate Zoology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation.

出版信息

J Morphol. 2017 May;278(5):718-733. doi: 10.1002/jmor.20666. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

Abstract

Tentacles are the main food-gathering organs of bryozoans. The most common design is a hollow tube of extracellular matrix (ECM), covered with ten columns of epithelial cells on the outside, and a coelothelium on the inside. Nerves follow the ECM, going between the bases of some epidermal cells. The tentacle musculature includes two bundles formed by myoepithelial cells of the coelothelium. The tentacles of freshwater (phylactolaemate) bryozoans, however, differ somewhat in structure from those of marine bryozoans. Here, we describe the tentacles of three species of phylactolaemates, comparing them to gymnolaemates and stenolaemates. Phylactolaemate tentacles tend to be longer, and with more voluminous coeloms. The composition of the frontal cell row and the number of frontal nerves is variable in freshwater bryozoans, but constant in marine groups. Abfrontal cells form a continuous row in Phylactolaemata, but occur intermittently in other two classes. Phylactolaemata lack the microvillar cuticle reported in Gymnolaemata. Abfrontal sensory tufts are always composed of pairs of mono- and/or biciliated cells. This arrangement differs from individual abfrontal ciliary cells of other bryozoans: monociliated in Stenolaemata and monociliated and multiciliated ones in Gymnolaemata. In all three groups, however, ciliated abfrontal cells probably serve as mechanoreceptors. We confirm previously described phylactolemate traits: an unusual arrangement of two-layered coelothelium lining the lateral sides of the tentacle and oral slits in the intertentacular membrane. As previously reported, tentacle movements involved in feeding differ between bryozoan groups, with phylactolaemates tending to have slower movements than both gymnolaemates and stenolaemates, and a narrower behavioral repertoire than gymnolaemates. The morphological and ultrastructural differences between the freshwater species we studied and marine bryozoans may be related to these functional differences. Muscle organization, tentacle and coelom size, and degree of confluence between tentacle and lophophore coeloms probably account for much of the observed behavioral variability.

摘要

触手是苔藓虫主要的食物收集器官。最常见的结构是一个由细胞外基质(ECM)构成的中空管,外面覆盖着十列上皮细胞,里面有一层体腔上皮。神经沿着ECM走行,在一些表皮细胞的基部之间穿行。触手肌肉组织包括由体腔上皮的肌上皮细胞形成的两束。然而,淡水苔藓虫(苔藓虫纲有柄目)的触手在结构上与海洋苔藓虫的触手有所不同。在这里,我们描述了三种有柄目苔藓虫的触手,并将它们与裸唇目和窄唇目苔藓虫进行比较。有柄目苔藓虫的触手往往更长,体腔也更宽大。淡水苔藓虫额细胞排的组成和额神经的数量是可变的,但在海洋类群中是恒定的。在苔藓虫纲有柄目中,后额细胞形成连续的一排,但在其他两个纲中是间歇性出现的。苔藓虫纲有柄目没有裸唇目中报道的微绒毛角质层。后额感觉簇总是由成对的单纤毛和/或双纤毛细胞组成。这种排列与其他苔藓虫的单个后额纤毛细胞不同:窄唇目中是单纤毛的,裸唇目中是单纤毛和多纤毛的。然而,在所有这三个类群中,有纤毛的后额细胞可能都作为机械感受器。我们证实了之前描述的有柄目苔藓虫的特征:触手侧面和触手间膜中的口裂内衬有两层体腔上皮的不寻常排列。如先前报道的那样,不同苔藓虫类群在摄食时触手的运动有所不同,有柄目苔藓虫的运动往往比裸唇目和窄唇目苔藓虫都慢,行为模式也比裸唇目苔藓虫更窄。我们研究的淡水物种与海洋苔藓虫之间的形态和超微结构差异可能与这些功能差异有关。肌肉组织、触手和体腔大小,以及触手和触手冠体腔之间的融合程度可能是观察到的行为变异性的主要原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验