Suppr超能文献

在年轻人和老年人进行双任务训练后,没有证据表明任务自动化。

No evidence for task automatization after dual-task training in younger and older adults.

作者信息

Strobach Tilo, Schubert Torsten

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Medical School Hamburg.

Department of Psychology, Martin-Luther University Halle.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2017 Feb;32(1):28-41. doi: 10.1037/pag0000144.

Abstract

The present study investigated the ability of older adults in contrast to younger adults to automatize new choice tasks as a result of simultaneous dual-task practice. Importantly, the study was carried out in conditions optimal for dual-task performance and task automatization. Despite this, the results of detailed analyses were not consistent with the assumption that either older or younger adults are able to automatize new choice tasks; neither group showed evidence of automatization. Even in analyses focusing on high dual-task performers (i.e., individuals who performed equally well in single and dual tasks) the results were not consistent with this assumption. Instead, it seems to be the case that both older and younger adults continue to use capacity-limited processes to process choice tasks after dual-task practice. These conclusions are consistent with findings from studies using single-task practice and tests of task automatization in dual tasks (Maquestiaux, Laguë-Beauvais, Ruthruff, Hartley, & Bherer, 2010; Maquestiaux, Didierjean, Ruthruff, Chauvel, & Hartley, 2013). (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

本研究调查了与年轻人相比,老年人因同时进行双任务练习而自动执行新选择任务的能力。重要的是,该研究是在双任务表现和任务自动化的最佳条件下进行的。尽管如此,详细分析的结果与老年人或年轻人能够自动执行新选择任务的假设并不一致;两组均未显示出自动化的证据。即使在关注高双任务执行者(即在单任务和双任务中表现同样出色的个体)的分析中,结果也与该假设不一致。相反,似乎老年人和年轻人在双任务练习后继续使用容量有限的过程来处理选择任务。这些结论与使用单任务练习和双任务中任务自动化测试的研究结果一致(Maquestiaux、Laguë-Beauvais、Ruthruff、Hartley和Bherer,2010年;Maquestiaux、Didierjean、Ruthruff、Chauvel和Hartley,2013年)。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验