Neudorf Christina M, Smith Nicole, Lepofsky Dana, Toniello Ginevra, Lian Olav B
Department of Geography and the Environment, University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC, Canada.
Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 9;12(2):e0171775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171775. eCollection 2017.
Rock-walled archaeological features are notoriously hard to date, largely because of the absence of suitable organic material for radiocarbon dating. This study demonstrates the efficacy of dating clam garden wall construction using optical dating, and uses optical ages to determine how sedimentation rates in the intertidal zone are affected by clam garden construction. Clam gardens are rock-walled, intertidal terraces that were constructed and maintained by coastal First Nation peoples to increase bivalve habitat and productivity. These features are evidence of ancient shellfish mariculture on the Pacific Northwest and, based on radiocarbon dating, date to at least the late Holocene. Optical dating exploits the luminescence signals of quartz or feldspar minerals to determine the last time the minerals were exposed to sunlight (i.e., their burial age), and thus does not require the presence of organic material. Optical ages were obtained from three clam garden sites on northern Quadra Island, British Columbia, and their reliability was assessed by comparing them to radiocarbon ages derived from shells underneath the clam garden walls, as well as below the terrace sediments. Our optical and radiocarbon ages suggest that construction of these clam garden walls commenced between ~1000 and ~1700 years ago, and our optical ages suggest that construction of the walls was likely incremental and increased sedimentation rates in the intertidal zone by up to fourfold. Results of this study show that when site characteristics are not amenable to radiocarbon dating, optical dating may be the only viable geochronometer. Furthermore, dating rock-walled marine management features and their geomorphic impact can lead to significant advances in our understanding of the intimate relationships that Indigenous peoples worldwide developed with their seascapes.
有岩石墙的考古遗迹 notoriously hard to date,很大程度上是因为缺乏适合进行放射性碳测年的有机材料。本研究证明了使用光释光测年法测定蛤田围墙建造年代的有效性,并利用光释光年龄来确定潮间带的沉积速率如何受到蛤田建造的影响。蛤田是有岩石墙的潮间带阶地,由沿海原住民建造和维护,以增加双壳贝类的栖息地和生产力。这些遗迹是太平洋西北地区古代贝类海水养殖的证据,根据放射性碳测年,其年代至少可追溯到全新世晚期。光释光测年利用石英或长石矿物的发光信号来确定矿物最后一次暴露于阳光的时间(即它们的埋藏年龄),因此不需要有机材料的存在。从不列颠哥伦比亚省夸德拉岛北部的三个蛤田遗址获得了光释光年龄,并通过将其与蛤田围墙下方以及阶地沉积物下方贝壳的放射性碳年龄进行比较,评估了其可靠性。我们的光释光和放射性碳年龄表明,这些蛤田围墙的建造始于约1000至约1700年前,我们的光释光年龄表明围墙的建造可能是渐进式的,并且使潮间带的沉积速率提高了多达四倍。本研究结果表明,当遗址特征不适合进行放射性碳测年时,光释光测年可能是唯一可行的地质年代测定方法。此外,测定有岩石墙的海洋管理遗迹及其地貌影响,可能会使我们在理解世界各地原住民与其海景之间的密切关系方面取得重大进展。