Greene Elizabeth, Pack Allison, Stanton Jill, Shelus Victoria, Tolley Elizabeth E, Taylor Jamilah, El Sadr Wafaa M, Branson Bernard M, Leider Jason, Rakhmanina Natella, Gamble Theresa
Science Facilitation Department, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 9;12(2):e0170686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170686. eCollection 2017.
HPTN 065 (TLC-Plus) evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of providing quarterly $70 gift card financial incentives to HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) to encourage ART adherence and viral suppression, and represents the largest study to-date of a financial incentive intervention for HIV viral suppression. A post-trial qualitative substudy was undertaken to examine acceptability of the financial incentives among those receiving and implementing the intervention.
Between July and October 2013, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 72 patients and 12 investigators from 14 sites; three focus groups were conducted with 12 staff from 10 sites. Qualitative data collection elicited experiences with and attitudes about the intervention, including philosophical viewpoints and implementation experiences. Transcripts were analyzed in NVivo 10. Memos and matrices were developed to explore themes from different participant group perspectives.
Patients, investigators, and staff found the intervention highly acceptable, primarily due to the emotional benefits gained through giving or receiving the incentive. Feeling rewarded or cared for was a main value perceived by patients; this was closely tied to the financial benefit for some. Other factors influencing acceptability for all included perceived effectiveness and health-related benefits, philosophical concerns about the use of incentives for health behavior change, and implementation issues. The termination of the incentive at the end of the study was disappointing to participants and unexpected by some, but generally accepted.
Positive experiences with the financial incentive intervention and strategies used to facilitate implementation led to high acceptability of the intervention, despite some reluctance in principle to the use of incentives. The findings of this analysis provide encouraging evidence in support of the acceptability of a large-scale financial incentive intervention for HIV viral suppression in a clinical setting, and offer valuable lessons for future applications of similar interventions.
HPTN 065(强化关爱)评估了每季度向接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的艾滋病毒感染患者提供70美元礼品卡经济激励措施以鼓励坚持ART治疗和病毒抑制的可行性和有效性,该研究是迄今为止针对艾滋病毒病毒抑制的经济激励干预措施规模最大的研究。开展了一项试验后定性子研究,以考察接受和实施该干预措施者对经济激励措施的接受程度。
2013年7月至10月期间,对来自14个地点的72名患者和12名研究人员进行了半结构式访谈;对来自10个地点的12名工作人员进行了3次焦点小组访谈。定性数据收集工作引出了对该干预措施的体验和态度,包括哲学观点和实施经验。在NVivo 10中对访谈记录进行了分析。编写了备忘录和矩阵,以从不同参与者群体的角度探索主题。
患者、研究人员和工作人员发现该干预措施非常容易接受,主要原因是通过给予或接受激励所获得的情感益处。感到得到奖励或关心是患者所感受到的主要价值;对一些人来说,这与经济利益密切相关。影响所有人接受程度的其他因素包括感知到的有效性和与健康相关的益处、对使用激励措施改变健康行为的哲学担忧以及实施问题。研究结束时激励措施的终止让参与者感到失望,一些人对此感到意外,但总体上还是被接受了。
尽管原则上有些人不太愿意使用激励措施,但经济激励干预措施的积极体验以及为促进实施所采用的策略导致该干预措施具有很高的接受度。该分析结果提供了令人鼓舞的证据,支持在临床环境中大规模实施经济激励干预措施以抑制艾滋病毒病毒的可接受性,并为未来类似干预措施的应用提供了宝贵经验。