• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以患者为中心的出院工具的影响:一项系统综述。

Impact of patient-centered discharge tools: A systematic review.

作者信息

Okrainec Karen, Lau Davina, Abrams Howard B, Hahn-Goldberg Shoshanna, Brahmbhatt Ronak, Huynh Tai, Lam Kenneth, Bell Chaim M

机构信息

University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2017 Feb;12(2):110-117. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2692.

DOI:10.12788/jhm.2692
PMID:28182809
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-centered discharge tools provide an opportunity to engage patients, enhance patient understanding, and improve capacity for self-care and postdischarge outcomes.

PURPOSE

To review studies that engaged patients in the design or delivery of discharge instruction tools and that tested their effect among hospitalized patients.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a search of 12 databases and journals from January 1994 through May 2014, and references of retrieved studies.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language studies that tested discharge tools meant to engage patients were selected. Studies that measured outcomes after 3 months or without a control group or period were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent reviewers assessed the full-text papers and extracted data on features of patient engagement.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Thirty articles met inclusion criteria, 28 of which examined educational tools. Of these, 13 articles involved patients in content creation or tool delivery, with only 6 studies involving patients in both. While many of these studies (10 studies) demonstrated an improvement in patient comprehension, few studies found improvement in patient adherence despite their engagement. A few studies demonstrated an improvement in self-efficacy (2 studies) and a reduction in unplanned visits (3 studies).

CONCLUSIONS

Improving patient engagement through the use of media, visual aids, or by involving patients when creating or delivering a discharge tool improves comprehension. However, further studies are needed to clarify the effect on patient experience, adherence, and healthcare utilization postdischarge. Better characterization of the level of patient engagement when designing discharge tools is needed given the heterogeneity found in current studies. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12:110-117.

摘要

背景

以患者为中心的出院工具为患者参与、增强患者理解以及提高自我护理能力和出院后结局提供了契机。

目的

回顾让患者参与出院指导工具设计或交付并在住院患者中测试其效果的研究。

数据来源

我们检索了1994年1月至2014年5月期间的12个数据库和期刊以及检索到的研究的参考文献。

研究选择

选取测试旨在让患者参与的出院工具的英文研究。排除测量3个月后结局或无对照组或对照期的研究。

数据提取

两名独立评审员评估全文论文并提取关于患者参与特征的数据。

数据综合

30篇文章符合纳入标准,其中28篇研究了教育工具。其中,13篇文章让患者参与内容创建或工具交付,只有6项研究让患者同时参与这两方面。虽然这些研究中的许多(10项研究)表明患者理解有所改善,但很少有研究发现尽管患者参与了,其依从性有所改善。少数研究表明自我效能有所提高(2项研究),计划外就诊有所减少(3项研究)。

结论

通过使用媒体、视觉辅助工具或在创建或交付出院工具时让患者参与来提高患者参与度可改善理解。然而,需要进一步研究以阐明对患者体验、依从性和出院后医疗保健利用的影响。鉴于当前研究中发现的异质性,在设计出院工具时需要更好地描述患者参与水平。《医院医学杂志》2017年;12:110 - 117。

相似文献

1
Impact of patient-centered discharge tools: A systematic review.以患者为中心的出院工具的影响:一项系统综述。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Feb;12(2):110-117. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2692.
2
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
3
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
4
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
5
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
6
Interventions to improve adherence to inhaled steroids for asthma.改善哮喘患者吸入性糖皮质激素依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 18;4(4):CD012226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012226.pub2.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
10
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the gaps: A comprehensive, equity-focused observational examination of Emergency Department discharge.揭示差距:一项针对急诊科出院情况的全面、关注公平性的观察性调查。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 28;20(8):e0331226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331226. eCollection 2025.
2
Lost in Translation: Preoperative Orthopaedic Education Materials Significantly Exceed Recommended Reading Levels.翻译失误:术前骨科教育材料的阅读水平显著超过推荐标准。
JB JS Open Access. 2025 Aug 7;10(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00143. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
3
The impact of patient engagement on patient safety in care transitions after cancer treatment: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
患者参与对癌症治疗后护理交接中患者安全的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 27;19(8):e0307831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307831. eCollection 2024.
4
Platform-Based Patient-Clinician Digital Health Interventions for Care Transitions: Protocol for a Scoping Review.基于平台的患者-临床医生数字健康干预措施用于护理过渡:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Apr 5;12:e42056. doi: 10.2196/42056.
5
Development of a Survey Tool: Understanding the Patient Experience With Personalized 3D Models in Surgical Patient Education.一种调查工具的开发:了解手术患者教育中个性化3D模型的患者体验。
Cureus. 2023 Feb 18;15(2):e35134. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35134. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Protocol for a scoping review of patient-clinician digital health interventions for the population with hip fracture.髋部骨折人群的患者-临床医生数字健康干预措施的范围审查方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 23;12(11):e064988. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064988.
7
Raising the bar for patient experience during care transitions in Canada: A repeated cross-sectional survey evaluating a patient-oriented discharge summary at Ontario hospitals.提高加拿大医疗转衔期间患者体验标准:一项评估安大略省医院以患者为导向的出院小结的重复横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 4;17(10):e0268418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268418. eCollection 2022.
8
Development and pilot implementation of a patient-oriented discharge summary for critically Ill patients.针对重症患者的以患者为导向的出院小结的开发与试点实施。
World J Crit Care Med. 2022 Jul 9;11(4):255-268. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i4.255.
9
Development of a tool to evaluate medication management guidance provided to carers of people living with dementia at hospital discharge: a mixed methods study.开发一种工具来评估在医院出院时为照顾痴呆症患者的护理人员提供的药物管理指导:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 2;12(5):e058237. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058237.
10
Centredness in health care: A systematic overview of reviews.医疗保健中的以患者为中心:系统评价综述。
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):885-901. doi: 10.1111/hex.13461. Epub 2022 Mar 8.