Suppr超能文献

痴呆患者运动-认知双重任务评估的效度、重测信度、变化敏感性及可行性

Validity, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change and feasibility of motor-cognitive dual task assessments in patients with dementia.

作者信息

Lemke Nele C, Wiloth Stefanie, Werner Christian, Hauer Klaus

机构信息

Network Aging Research (NAR), University of Heidelberg, Bergheimer Straße 20, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany; AGAPLESION Bethanien Hospital, Geriatric Centre of the University of Heidelberg, Rohrbacher Straße 149, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.

AGAPLESION Bethanien Hospital, Geriatric Centre of the University of Heidelberg, Rohrbacher Straße 149, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 May-Jun;70:169-179. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.01.016. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate validity, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and feasibility of dual task (DT) assessments in patients with dementia.

DESIGN

Validation study.

SETTING

Post ward-rehabilitation.

PARTICIPANTS

Geriatric patients (n=105) with dementia (age 82.7±5.9, MMSE score 21.9).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Psychometric quality of DT performance of different DT-tests. Analyses were performed for motor and cognitive performance, and relative DT costs (DTCs).

RESULTS

Spearman's rank correlations (r) between examined DT-tests were moderate-high for motor tasks (r=0.29-0.90), small-high for cognitive tasks (r=0.12-0.55) and small-high for relative DTCs (motor DTCs r=0.02-0.61, cognitive DTCs r=-0.19 to 0.06, combined DTCs r=-0.11 to 0.31). Correlations with external assessment were moderate-high for motor tasks (r=0.25-0.84), small-moderate for cognitive tasks (r=-0.10 to 0.46) and small-moderate for relative DTCs (motor DTCs r=-0.09 to 0.17, cognitive DTCs r=-0.03 to 0.21, combined DTCs r=-0.07 to 0.26). Test-retest reliability was excellent for motor tasks (ICC=0.75-0.96), fair-excellent for cognitive tasks (ICC=0.51-0.88) and poor-good for relative DTCs (motor DTCs ICC=0.10-0.74, cognitive DTCs ICC=0.05-0.65, combined DTCs ICC=0.15-0.71). Sensitivity to change was acceptable-excellent for trained DT-tests (p≤0.01). Effect sizes were small-large for gait parameters (SRM=0.30-1.12), large for cognitive tasks (SRM=0.82-0.95) and small-large for relative DTCs (motor DTCs SRM=0.15-0.77, cognitive DTCs SRM=0.56-0.98, combined DTCs SRM=0.40-1.10). Completion time ranged from 13.1 to 16.9min.

CONCLUSIONS

All DT-tests showed acceptable-excellent psychometric properties in patients with dementia with highest quality for the gait-based tests 'Walking & Counting' and 'Walking & reciting ABC'.

摘要

目的

探讨双重任务(DT)评估在痴呆患者中的有效性、重测信度、变化敏感性和可行性。

设计

验证性研究。

地点

病房康复后。

参与者

老年痴呆患者(n = 105)(年龄82.7±5.9,简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)评分21.9)。

主要观察指标

不同DT测试中DT表现的心理测量学质量。对运动和认知表现以及相对DT成本(DTC)进行分析。

结果

在检查的DT测试之间,运动任务的斯皮尔曼等级相关性(r)为中等偏高(r = 0.29 - 0.90),认知任务为低到高(r = 0.12 - 0.55),相对DTC为低到高(运动DTC r = 0.02 - 0.61,认知DTC r = -0.19至0.06,综合DTC r = -0.11至0.31)。与外部评估的相关性,运动任务为中等偏高(r = 0.25 - 0.84),认知任务为低到中等(r = -0.10至0.46),相对DTC为低到中等(运动DTC r = -0.09至0.17,认知DTC r = -0.03至0.21,综合DTC r = -0.07至0.26)。运动任务的重测信度极佳(组内相关系数(ICC)= 0.75 - 0.96),认知任务为一般到极佳(ICC = 0.51 - 0.88),相对DTC为差到好(运动DTC ICC = 0.10 - 0.74,认知DTC ICC = 0.05 - 0.65,综合DTC ICC = 0.15 - 0.71)。对于经过训练的DT测试,变化敏感性为可接受至极佳(p≤0.01)。效应大小,步态参数为小到大(标准化反应均值(SRM)= 0.30 - 1.12),认知任务为大(SRM = 0.82 - 0.95),相对DTC为小到大(运动DTC SRM = 0.15 - 0.77,认知DTC SRM = 0.56 - 0.98,综合DTC SRM = 0.40 - 1.10)。完成时间为13.1至16.9分钟。

结论

所有DT测试在痴呆患者中均显示出可接受至极佳的心理测量学特性,基于步态的测试“边走边数”和“边走边背诵字母表”质量最高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验