Hall Charlotte L, Valentine Althea Z, Walker Gemma M, Ball Harriet M, Cogger Heather, Daley David, Groom Madeleine J, Sayal Kapil, Hollis Chris
Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, CLAHRC-EM, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham & Centre for ADHD and Neurodevelopmental Disorders across the Lifespan (CANDAL), Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 10;17(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1222-5.
The diagnosis and monitoring of Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) typically relies on subjective reports and observations. Objective continuous performance tests (CPTs) have been incorporated into some services to support clinical decision making. However, the feasibility and acceptability of adding such a test into routine practice is unknown. The study aimed to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of adding an objective computerised test to the routine assessment and monitoring of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians (n = 10) and families (parents/young people, n = 20) who participated in a randomised controlled trial. Additionally, the same clinicians (n = 10) and families (n = 76) completed a survey assessing their experience of the QbTest. The study took place in child and adolescent mental health and community paediatric clinics across the UK. Interview transcripts were thematically analysed.
Interviewed clinicians and families valued the QbTest for providing an objective, valid assessment of symptoms. The QbTest was noted to facilitate communication between clinicians, families and schools. However, whereas clinicians were more unanimous on the usefulness of the QbTest, survey findings showed that, although the majority of families found the test useful, less than half felt the QbTest helped them understand the clinician's decision making around diagnosis and medication. The QbTest was seen as a potentially valuable tool to use early in the assessment process to streamline the care pathway. Although clinicians were conscious of the additional costs, these could be offset by reductions in time to diagnosis and the delivery of the test by a Healthcare Assistant.
The findings indicate the QbTest is an acceptable and feasible tool to implement in routine clinical settings. Clinicians should be mindful to discuss the QbTest results with families to enable their understanding and engagement with the process. Further findings from definitive trials are required to understand the cost/benefit; however, the findings from this study support the feasibility and acceptability of integrating QbTest in the ADHD care pathway.
The findings form the implementation component of the Assessing QbTest Utility in ADHD (AQUA) Trial which is registered with the ISRCTN registry ( ISRCTN11727351 , retrospectively registered 04 July 2016) and clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02209116 , registered 04 August 2014).
注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的诊断和监测通常依赖主观报告和观察。客观持续性操作测试(CPT)已被纳入一些服务中以支持临床决策。然而,将此类测试添加到常规实践中的可行性和可接受性尚不清楚。本研究旨在调查在注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的常规评估和监测中添加客观计算机化测试的可行性和可接受性。
对参与一项随机对照试验的临床医生(n = 10)和家庭(父母/年轻人,n = 20)进行了半结构化访谈。此外,相同的临床医生(n = 10)和家庭(n = 76)完成了一项评估他们对QbTest体验的调查。该研究在英国各地的儿童和青少年心理健康及社区儿科诊所进行。对访谈记录进行了主题分析。
接受访谈的临床医生和家庭重视QbTest能够对症状进行客观、有效的评估。注意到QbTest有助于临床医生、家庭和学校之间的沟通。然而,虽然临床医生对QbTest的有用性意见更为一致,但调查结果显示,尽管大多数家庭认为该测试有用,但不到一半的家庭觉得QbTest帮助他们理解临床医生在诊断和用药方面的决策。QbTest被视为在评估过程早期使用的一种潜在有价值的工具,可简化护理流程。虽然临床医生意识到会增加成本,但这些成本可以通过缩短诊断时间以及由医疗保健助理进行测试来抵消。
研究结果表明QbTest是一种在常规临床环境中可接受且可行的工具。临床医生应注意与家庭讨论QbTest结果,以使他们理解并参与该过程。需要确定性试验的进一步结果来了解成本/效益;然而,本研究的结果支持将QbTest纳入ADHD护理流程的可行性和可接受性。
这些结果构成了ADHD中评估QbTest效用(AQUA)试验的实施部分,该试验已在ISRCTN注册库(ISRCTN11727351,2016年7月4日追溯注册)和clinicaltrials.gov(NCT02209116,2014年8月4日注册)注册。