Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Centre for Interventional Paediatric Psychopharmacology and Rare Diseases, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;32(6):921-935. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02148-1. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
The COVID-19 pandemic led ADHD services to modify the clinical practice to reduce in-person contact as much as possible to minimise viral spread. This had far-reaching effects on day-to-day clinical practice as remote assessments were widely adopted. Despite the attenuation of the acute threat from COVID, many clinical services are retaining some remote practices. The lack of clear evidence-based guidance about the most appropriate way to conduct remote assessments meant that these changes were typically implemented in a localised, ad hoc, and un-coordinated way. Here, the European ADHD Guidelines Group (EAGG) discusses the strengths and weaknesses of remote assessment methods of children and adolescents with ADHD in a narrative review based on available data and expert opinions to highlight key recommendations for future studies and clinical practice. We conclude that going forward, despite remote working in clinical services functioning adequately during the pandemic, all required components of ADHD assessment should still be completed following national/international guidelines; however, the process may need adaptation. Social restrictions, including changes in education provision, can either mask or exacerbate features associated with ADHD and therefore assessment should carefully chart symptom profile and impairment prior to, as well as during an ongoing pandemic. While remote assessments are valuable in allowing clinical services to continue despite restrictions and may have benefits for routine care in the post-pandemic world, particular attention must be paid to those who may be at high risk but not be able to use/access remote technologies and prioritize these groups for conventional face-to-face assessments.
COVID-19 大流行导致注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)服务机构修改临床实践,尽可能减少人际接触,以最大程度地减少病毒传播。这对日常临床实践产生了深远的影响,因为远程评估已被广泛采用。尽管 COVID 的急性威胁已经减弱,但许多临床服务仍保留一些远程实践。由于缺乏关于进行远程评估的最合适方法的明确循证指导,这些变化通常是以本地化、临时和不协调的方式实施的。在这里,欧洲 ADHD 指南小组(EAGG)根据现有数据和专家意见,以叙述性评论的形式讨论了远程评估 ADHD 儿童和青少年方法的优缺点,以突出对未来研究和临床实践的关键建议。我们的结论是,尽管在大流行期间,临床服务的远程工作运行良好,但仍应按照国家/国际指南完成 ADHD 评估的所有必需组成部分;然而,该过程可能需要调整。社会限制,包括教育提供方式的改变,可能会掩盖或加剧与 ADHD 相关的特征,因此,在大流行之前和期间,评估应仔细记录症状特征和损伤。虽然远程评估在限制下允许临床服务继续进行,并且在大流行后的世界中可能对常规护理有好处,但必须特别注意那些可能处于高风险但无法使用/访问远程技术的人,并优先为这些群体提供传统的面对面评估。