Manco-Johnson Marilyn J, Soucie J Michael, Gill Joan Cox
Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO.
National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Blood. 2017 Apr 27;129(17):2368-2374. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-02-683169. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
This analysis of the US Hemophilia Treatment Center Network and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance registry assessed trends in prophylaxis use and its impact on key indicators of arthropathy across the life-span among participants with severe hemophilia A. Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were collected prospectively between 1999 and 2010 at annual clinical visits to 134 hemophilia treatment centers. Trends in treatment and outcomes were evaluated using cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Data analyzed included 26 614 visits for 6196 males; mean age at first registry visit was 17.7 years; and median was 14 (range, 2 to 69). During this time, prophylaxis use increased from 31% to 59% overall, and by 2010, 75% of children and youths <20 years were on prophylaxis. On cross-sectional analysis, bleeding rates decreased dramatically for the entire population ( < .001) in parallel with increased prophylaxis usage, possibly because frequent bleeders adopted prophylaxis. Joint bleeding decreased proportionately with prophylaxis (22%) and nonprophylaxis (23%), and target joints decreased more with prophylaxis (80% vs 61%). Joint, total, and target joint bleeding on prophylaxis were 33%, 41%, and 27%, respectively, compared with nonprophylaxis. On longitudinal analysis of individuals over time, prophylaxis predicted decreased bleeding at any age ( < .001), but only prophylaxis initiation prior to age 4 years and nonobesity predicted preservation of joint motion ( < .001 for each). Using a national registry, care providers in a specialized health care network for a rare disorder were able to detect and track trends in outcomes over time.
这项针对美国血友病治疗中心网络和疾病控制与预防中心监测登记处的分析,评估了重度甲型血友病患者在整个生命周期中预防治疗的使用趋势及其对关节病关键指标的影响。1999年至2010年期间,在对134个血友病治疗中心进行的年度临床访视中前瞻性收集了人口统计学、临床特征和结局数据。使用横断面分析和纵向分析评估治疗和结局趋势。分析的数据包括6196名男性的26614次访视;首次登记访视的平均年龄为17.7岁;中位数为14岁(范围为2至69岁)。在此期间,预防治疗的总体使用率从31%增至59%,到2010年,75%的20岁以下儿童和青少年接受了预防治疗。横断面分析显示,随着预防治疗使用率的增加,整个人群的出血率大幅下降(P<0.001),这可能是因为频繁出血者采用了预防治疗。关节出血在接受预防治疗组(22%)和未接受预防治疗组(23%)中均成比例下降,目标关节在接受预防治疗组中下降得更多(80%对61%)。接受预防治疗时的关节、总出血和目标关节出血分别为33%、41%和27%,而未接受预防治疗时分别为[此处原文缺失未接受预防治疗时对应数据]。对个体进行随时间的纵向分析显示,预防治疗可预测任何年龄出血的减少(P<0.001),但只有在4岁之前开始预防治疗且非肥胖者才能预测关节活动的保留(每项P<0.001)。通过一个国家登记处,一个针对罕见疾病的专业医疗保健网络中的医护人员能够随时间检测和追踪结局趋势。