Department of Quality of Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Feb 9;27:16086. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.86.
Patients with difficult-to-manage asthma represent a heterogeneous subgroup of asthma patients who require extensive assessment and tailored management. The International Primary Care Respiratory Group approach emphasises the importance of differentiating patients with asthma that is difficult to manage from those with severe disease. Local adaptation of this approach, however, is required to ensure an appropriate strategy for implementation in the Dutch context. We used a modified three-round e-Delphi approach to assess the opinion of all relevant stakeholders (general practitioners, pulmonologists, practice nurses, pulmonary nurses and people with asthma). In the first round, the participants were asked to provide potentially relevant items for a difficult-to-manage asthma programme, which resulted in 67 items. In the second round, we asked participants to rate the relevance of specific items on a seven-point Likert scale, and 46 items were selected as relevant. In the third round, the selected items were categorised and items were ranked within the categories according to relevance. Finally, we created the alphabet acronym for the categories 'the A-I of difficult-to-manage asthma' to resonate with an established Dutch 'A-E acronym for determining asthma control'. This should facilitate implementation of this programme within the existing structure of educational material on asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in primary care, with potential for improving management of difficult-to-manage asthma. Other countries could use a similar approach to create a locally adapted version of such a programme.
患有难治性哮喘的患者代表了一组具有异质性的哮喘患者亚组,他们需要进行广泛的评估和针对性的管理。国际初级保健呼吸组的方法强调了区分难以管理的哮喘患者和严重疾病患者的重要性。然而,需要对这种方法进行本土化的调整,以确保在荷兰背景下实施适当的策略。我们使用改良的三轮电子德尔菲法来评估所有相关利益攸关方(全科医生、肺病专家、执业护士、肺科护士和哮喘患者)的意见。在第一轮中,参与者被要求提供可能与难以管理的哮喘计划相关的项目,这导致了 67 个项目。在第二轮中,我们要求参与者在七点李克特量表上对特定项目的相关性进行评分,有 46 个项目被选为相关项目。在第三轮中,选定的项目被分类,并根据相关性对项目进行排序。最后,我们创建了“难以管理的哮喘的 A-I”类别的字母缩写,以与既定的荷兰“确定哮喘控制的 A-E 缩写”产生共鸣。这应该有助于在初级保健中现有的哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)教育材料的现有结构内实施该计划,从而有可能改善难以管理的哮喘的管理。其他国家可以采用类似的方法来创建这种计划的本土化版本。