Dept of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Dept of General Practice, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Oct 3;27(1):55. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0057-3.
While asthma presentation is heterogeneous, current asthma management guidelines in primary care are quite homogeneous. In this study we aim to cluster patients together into different phenotypes, that may aid the general practitioner in individualised asthma management. We analysed data from the ACCURATE trial, containing 611 adult asthmatics, 18-50 year-old, treated in primary care, with one year follow-up. Variables obtained at baseline (n = 14), were assessed by cluster analysis. Subsequently, established phenotypes were assessed separately on important asthma outcomes after one year follow-up: asthma control (Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)), quality of life (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)), exacerbation-rate and medication-usage. Five distinct phenotypes were identified. The first phenotype was predominantly defined by their early onset atopic form of asthma. The second phenotype mainly consisted of female patients with a late onset asthma. The third phenotype were patients with high reversibility rates after bronchodilator usage. The fourth phenotype were smokers and the final phenotype were frequent exacerbators. The exacerbators phenotype had the worst outcomes for asthma control and quality of life and experienced the highest exacerbation-rate, despite using the most medication. The early onset phenotype patients were relatively well controlled and their medication dosage was low.
INDIVIDUALIZING TREATMENT BY PHENOTYPE: Asthma patients should be characterised according to their individual asthma type to ensure more targeted treatment. Even though asthma manifests itself in a wide variety of forms with differing degrees of severity, treatment of the disease often takes a broad, one-size-fits-all approach. To determine if asthma can indeed be split into distinct phenotypes, Rishi Khusial at the Leiden University Medical Center and co-workers across the Netherlands analysed data from 611 adult asthmatics treated in primary care, and followed them up after one year. The team identified five phenotypes in the primary care cohort, including one group with early onset asthma, another whose asthma responded well to bronchodilators, and a group classed as frequent exacerbators. Further analysis of long-term asthma outcomes showed clear differences between phenotypes, particularly in terms of asthma control and quality of life.
虽然哮喘的表现形式多种多样,但初级保健中的现行哮喘管理指南相当统一。在这项研究中,我们旨在将患者聚类为不同的表型,这可能有助于全科医生进行个体化哮喘管理。我们分析了来自 ACCURATE 试验的数据,该试验包含 611 名 18-50 岁的成年哮喘患者,在初级保健中接受治疗,随访时间为一年。在基线时获得的变量(n=14)通过聚类分析进行评估。随后,在一年的随访后,分别评估已建立的表型对重要的哮喘结局的影响:哮喘控制(哮喘控制问卷(ACQ))、生活质量(哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ))、加重率和药物使用情况。确定了五个不同的表型。第一个表型主要由他们早发的特应性哮喘形式定义。第二个表型主要由晚发哮喘的女性患者组成。第三个表型是在使用支气管扩张剂后具有高可逆性率的患者。第四个表型是吸烟者,最后一个表型是频繁加重者。加重者表型的哮喘控制和生活质量最差,并且尽管使用了最多的药物,但经历了最高的加重率。早发表型患者的病情相对得到控制,并且他们的药物剂量较低。
通过表型进行个体化治疗:应根据患者的个体哮喘类型对哮喘患者进行特征描述,以确保更有针对性的治疗。尽管哮喘表现出广泛的形式,具有不同的严重程度,但疾病的治疗往往采取广泛的、一刀切的方法。为了确定哮喘是否确实可以分为不同的表型,莱顿大学医学中心的 Rishi Khusial 和荷兰各地的同事分析了来自在初级保健中接受治疗的 611 名成年哮喘患者的数据,并在一年后对他们进行了随访。该团队在初级保健队列中确定了五个表型,包括一个早发哮喘的组,另一个对支气管扩张剂反应良好的组,以及一个频繁加重的组。对长期哮喘结局的进一步分析显示,表型之间存在明显差异,特别是在哮喘控制和生活质量方面。