Respiratory Effectiveness Group, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Jan 5;27:16089. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.89.
REALISE Asia-an online questionnaire-based study of Asian asthma patients-identified five patient clusters defined in terms of their control status and attitude towards their asthma (categorised as: 'Well-adjusted and at least partly controlled'; 'In denial about symptoms'; 'Tolerating with poor control'; 'Adrift and poorly controlled'; 'Worried with multiple symptoms'). We developed consensus recommendations for tailoring management of these attitudinal-control clusters. An expert panel undertook a three-round electronic Delphi (e-Delphi): Round 1: panellists received descriptions of the attitudinal-control clusters and provided free text recommendations for their assessment and management. Round 2: panellists prioritised Round 1 recommendations and met (or joined a teleconference) to consolidate the recommendations. Round 3: panellists voted and prioritised the remaining recommendations. Consensus was defined as Round 3 recommendations endorsed by >50% of panellists. Highest priority recommendations were those receiving the highest score. The multidisciplinary panellists (9 clinicians, 1 pharmacist and 1 health social scientist; 7 from Asia) identified consensus recommendations for all clusters. Recommended pharmacological (e.g., step-up/down; self-management; simplified regimen) and non-pharmacological approaches (e.g., trigger management, education, social support; inhaler technique) varied substantially according to each cluster's attitude to asthma and associated psychosocial drivers of behaviour. The attitudinal-control clusters defined by REALISE Asia resonated with the international panel. Consensus was reached on appropriate tailored management approaches for all clusters. Summarised and incorporated into a structured management pathway, these recommendations could facilitate personalised care. Generalisability of these patient clusters should be assessed in other socio-economic, cultural and literacy groups and nationalities in Asia.
REALISE 亚洲——一项基于在线问卷的亚洲哮喘患者研究——根据控制状况和对哮喘的态度,确定了五个患者群体,分为以下几类:“调整良好且至少部分控制”、“对症状否认”、“耐受但控制不佳”、“放任自流且控制不佳”、“担忧且症状多样”。我们制定了针对这些态度-控制群体的管理的共识建议。一个专家小组进行了三轮电子德尔菲法(e-Delphi)调查:第一轮:小组成员收到了态度-控制群体的描述,并对其评估和管理提出了自由文本建议。第二轮:小组成员对第一轮建议进行了优先级排序,并进行了会议(或电话会议),以整合建议。第三轮:小组成员投票并对剩余建议进行了优先级排序。共识定义为第三轮建议得到超过 50%的小组成员的认可。优先级最高的建议是得分最高的建议。多学科小组成员(9 名临床医生、1 名药剂师和 1 名健康社会科学家;7 名来自亚洲)为所有群体确定了共识建议。推荐的药理学(例如,阶梯式治疗;自我管理;简化方案)和非药理学方法(例如,触发因素管理、教育、社会支持;吸入器技术)根据每个群体对哮喘的态度以及相关的行为社会心理驱动因素而有很大差异。REALISE 亚洲定义的态度-控制群体与国际小组产生了共鸣。就所有群体的适当定制管理方法达成了共识。这些建议可以概括并纳入结构化管理途径,从而促进个性化护理。应在亚洲的其他社会经济、文化和读写水平群体和国籍中评估这些患者群体的普遍性。