Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Kopernika, Krakow, Poland.
Ludwin & Ludwin Gynecology, Private Medical Center, Krakow, Poland.
Hum Reprod. 2017 Apr 1;32(4):758-769. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex013.
What is the diagnostic accuracy of 2D/3D hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) and 2D/3D-high-definition flow Doppler (HDF)-HyFoSy in comparison to laparoscopy with dye chromotubation (as the reference method) and 2D air/saline-enhanced hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) (as the initial index test)?
2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy had the best diagnostic accuracy and was the only method that did not significantly differ from the reference method, while both 2D/3D-HyFoSy and 2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy had significantly higher accuracy than 2D-air/saline-HyCoSy.
Previous studies on X-ray hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy and dye as the reference standard have undermined the impact of older commercial contrast agents on the accuracy of ultrasound tubal patency tests. Recently, HyFoSy was reported to have very high accuracy in a small pilot study in comparison to laparoscopy and dye, and had a very high positive predictive value (PPV) for medical tubal occlusion. A new Doppler sonographic technique, known as HDF imaging with better axial resolution, fewer blooming artifacts and higher sensitivity than color and power Doppler imaging, has been introduced.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A prospective observational study was performed on 132 women (259 Fallopian tubes) consecutively enrolled between 2013 and 2015.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: This study included infertile women of reproductive age who previously had not been examined for tubal patency and who presented for the evaluation to the university hospital, private hospital and clinic at which this study was conducted. 2D-Air/saline-HyCoSy, 2D/3D-HyFoSy and 2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy and laparoscopy were performed independently by experienced readers. During HyFoSy, the 3D mode was used for standardization of pelvic scanning and observations of contrast flow without diagnosis after volume acquisition. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value (NPV and PPV), negative and positive-likelihood ratio (LR- and LR+) and 95% CI were calculated. McNemar's test and relative predictive values (a comparison of NPV and PPV) were used to compare all the index tests.
2D-Air/saline-HyCoSy, 2D/3D-HyFoSy and 2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy indicated that 46 (17.8%), 27 (10.4%) and 24 (9.2%) of the 259 tubes were occluded, respectively; additionally, inconclusive results were obtained for 8 (3%), 5 (1.9%) and 3 (1.2%) tubes, respectively. The reference method revealed 18 (6.9%) occluded Fallopian tubes. 2D-Air/saline-HyCoSy had a high NPV (99.5%) that was similar to that of 2D/3D-HyFoSy (99%) and 2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy (99.6%) (P > 0.05), but had a very low PPV (30.4%). The use of 2D/3D-HyFoSy, especially 2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy, which had a significantly higher PPV (48% and 71%, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01; respectively), resulted in fewer false positive and inconclusive findings than the use of 2D-air/saline-HyCoSy. The LR- and LR+ was 0.14 and 14.8, respectively, for 2D/3D-HyFoSy, 0.06 and 32.1, respectively, for 2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy, and 0.08 and 6.9, respectively, for 2D-air/saline-HyCoSy. The number of inconclusive or positive results per patient was significantly fewer with 2D/3D-HyFoSy (odds ratio, OR = 0.5, CI = 0.3-0.95, P < 0.05) and 2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy (OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-0.8, P < 0.01) than with 2D-air/saline-HyCoSy.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: An unselected infertile population with a low prevalence of tubal occlusion is suitable for estimating the diagnostic accuracy of imaging tests only as a screening tool.
These findings can be used to establish a diagnostic strategy with high accuracy but minimum invasiveness and limited use of contrast agents and sophisticated technology. 2D-Air/saline-HyCoSy, which has a high NPV, is suitable as an initial test and basic screening method, but 2D/3D-HDF-HyFoSy, which has a significantly higher PPV, can be used as a standard to verify any questionable or positive results obtained with 2D HyCoSy. This strategy may signficantly reduce the need for laparoscopy as a reference standard.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): There was no external funding for this study, and the authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
N/A.
二维/三维宫腔内超声造影(HyFoSy)和二维/三维高分辨率血流多普勒(HDF)-HyFoSy 与腹腔镜联合染料染色输卵管通液术(作为参考方法)和二维空气/盐水增强宫腔内超声造影(HyCoSy)(作为初始索引测试)相比,其诊断准确性如何?
二维/三维-HDF-HyFoSy 的诊断准确性最高,且与参考方法无显著差异,而二维/三维-HyFoSy 和二维/三维-HDF-HyFoSy 的准确性均显著高于二维空气/盐水-HyCoSy。
之前关于 X 射线子宫输卵管造影和腹腔镜检查以及染料作为参考标准的研究降低了旧的商业造影剂对超声输卵管通畅性检查准确性的影响。最近,HyFoSy 在一项小型前瞻性研究中与腹腔镜和染料相比显示出非常高的准确性,并且对医学性输卵管阻塞具有非常高的阳性预测值(PPV)。一种新的多普勒超声技术,称为 HDF 成像,具有更好的轴向分辨率、更少的blooming 伪影和比彩色和功率多普勒成像更高的敏感性,已被引入。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:一项前瞻性观察性研究于 2013 年至 2015 年连续纳入 132 名年龄在生育期的不孕女性。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:该研究包括以前未检查过输卵管通畅性且因该研究所在的大学医院、私人医院和诊所就诊而接受评估的有生育能力的女性。进行二维空气/盐水-HyCoSy、二维/三维-HyFoSy 和二维/三维-HDF-HyFoSy 以及腹腔镜检查,由经验丰富的读者独立进行。在 HyFoSy 中,3D 模式用于盆腔扫描的标准化和对比流动观察,而无需在体积采集后进行诊断。计算了灵敏度、特异性、阴性和阳性预测值(NPV 和 PPV)、阴性和阳性似然比(LR-和 LR+)和 95%置信区间。使用 McNemar 检验和相对预测值(NPV 和 PPV 的比较)比较所有的索引测试。
二维空气/盐水-HyCoSy、二维/三维-HyFoSy 和二维/三维-HDF-HyFoSy 分别显示 259 条输卵管中有 46 条(17.8%)、27 条(10.4%)和 24 条(9.2%)阻塞;此外,还有 8 条(3%)、5 条(1.9%)和 3 条(1.2%)输卵管的结果不确定。参考方法显示 18 条(6.9%)输卵管阻塞。二维空气/盐水-HyCoSy 的 NPV 很高(99.5%),与二维/三维-HyFoSy(99%)和二维/三维-HDF-HyFoSy(99.6%)相似(P>0.05),但 PPV 非常低(30.4%)。使用二维/三维-HyFoSy,特别是二维/三维-HDF-HyFoSy,其 PPV 明显更高(48%和 71%,P<0.05 和 P<0.01;分别),导致假阳性和不确定结果的数量少于使用二维空气/盐水-HyCoSy。对于二维/三维-HyFoSy,LR-和 LR+分别为 0.14 和 14.8,对于二维/三维-HDF-HyFoSy,LR-和 LR+分别为 0.06 和 32.1,对于二维空气/盐水-HyCoSy,LR-和 LR+分别为 0.08 和 6.9。与二维空气/盐水-HyCoSy 相比,使用二维/三维-HyFoSy(优势比,OR=0.5,95%置信区间=0.3-0.95,P<0.05)和二维/三维-HDF-HyFoSy(OR=0.4,95%置信区间=0.2-0.8,P<0.01),不确定或阳性结果的数量明显更少。
局限性、谨慎的原因:选择未生育的不孕症患者,其输卵管阻塞的患病率较低,仅适用于估计影像学检查的诊断准确性,作为一种筛查工具。
这些发现可用于建立一种具有高准确性、最小侵袭性和有限使用造影剂和复杂技术的诊断策略。具有高 NPV 的二维空气/盐水-HyCoSy 适合作为初始测试和基本筛查方法,但具有显著更高的 PPV 的二维/三维-HDF-HyFoSy 可作为验证二维 HyCoSy 任何可疑或阳性结果的标准。这种策略可能会显著减少对腹腔镜作为参考标准的需求。
研究资金/利益冲突:本研究无外部资金支持,作者无利益冲突声明。
无。