• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威定期预约对宫颈癌筛查参与率的影响:一项随机干预研究

Impact of scheduled appointments on cervical screening participation in Norway: a randomised intervention.

作者信息

Lönnberg Stefan, Andreassen Trude, Engesæter Birgit, Lilleng Rune, Kleven Cecilia, Skare Annelie, Johansson Karin, Fredheim Christina Stangeland, Tropé Ameli

机构信息

Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Pathology, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e013728. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013728.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013728
PMID:28186949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5128903/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The main barrier to optimal effect in many established population-based screening programmes against cervical cancer is low participation. In Norway, a routine health service integrated population-based screening programme has been running since 1995, using open invitations and reminders. The aim of this randomised health service study was to pilot scheduled appointments and assess their potential for increased participation.

METHODS

Within the national screening programme, we randomised 1087 women overdue for screening to receive invitations with scheduled appointments (intervention) or the standard open reminders (control). Letters were sent 2-4 weeks before the scheduled appointments at three centres: a midwife clinic, a public healthcare centre and a general practitioner centre. The primary outcome was participation at 6 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes were participation at 1 and 3 months. Risk ratios (RRs) overall, and stratified by screening centre, age group and previous participation, were calculated using log-binomial regression.

RESULTS

At 6 months, 20% of the 510 women in the control group and 37% of the 526 women in the intervention group had participated in screening, excluding 51 women in total from analysis due to participation just before invitation and therefore not yet visible in the central records. The RR for participation at 6 months was 1.9 (95% CI 1.5 to 2.3). There was no significant heterogeneity between centres or age groups. Participation increased among women both with (RR 1.7; 95% CI 1.4 to 2.1) and without (RR 3.5; 95% CI 1.3 to 9.2) previous participation. The RRs for participation at 1 and 3 months were 4.0 (95% CI 2.6 to 6.2) and 2.7 (95% CI 2.1 to 3.5), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Scheduled appointments increased screening participation consistently across all target ages and screening centres among women overdue for screening. Participation increased also among women with no previous records of cervical screening.

摘要

背景

在许多已确立的基于人群的宫颈癌筛查项目中,实现最佳效果的主要障碍是参与率低。在挪威,自1995年以来一直在实施一项常规卫生服务综合人群筛查项目,采用公开邀请和提醒的方式。这项随机卫生服务研究的目的是试行预约安排并评估其提高参与率的潜力。

方法

在国家筛查项目中,我们将1087名逾期未筛查的女性随机分为两组,一组接受预约邀请(干预组),另一组接受标准的公开提醒(对照组)。在三个中心(一家助产士诊所、一家公共医疗中心和一家全科医生中心)于预约前2至4周发送信件。主要结局是随访6个月时的参与情况。次要结局是随访1个月和3个月时的参与情况。使用对数二项回归计算总体及按筛查中心、年龄组和既往参与情况分层的风险比(RR)。

结果

6个月时,对照组510名女性中有20%参与了筛查,干预组526名女性中有37%参与了筛查,共有51名女性因在邀请前刚刚参与筛查而未纳入分析,因为她们在中心记录中尚未显示。6个月时参与筛查的RR为1.9(95%CI 1.5至2.3)。各中心或年龄组之间无显著异质性。既往参与过筛查的女性(RR 1.7;95%CI 1.4至2.1)和未参与过筛查的女性(RR 3.5;95%CI 1.3至9.2)的参与率均有所提高。1个月和3个月时参与筛查的RR分别为4.0(95%CI 2.6至6.2)和2.7(95%CI 2.1至3.5)。

结论

预约安排使逾期未筛查女性在所有目标年龄组和筛查中心的筛查参与率均持续提高。既往无宫颈癌筛查记录的女性的参与率也有所提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7512/5128903/f7d922082ace/bmjopen2016013728f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7512/5128903/5f2a4b27920c/bmjopen2016013728f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7512/5128903/1d307fc5b803/bmjopen2016013728f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7512/5128903/f7d922082ace/bmjopen2016013728f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7512/5128903/5f2a4b27920c/bmjopen2016013728f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7512/5128903/1d307fc5b803/bmjopen2016013728f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7512/5128903/f7d922082ace/bmjopen2016013728f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of scheduled appointments on cervical screening participation in Norway: a randomised intervention.挪威定期预约对宫颈癌筛查参与率的影响:一项随机干预研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e013728. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013728.
2
A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.基于初级保健的干预措施改善丹麦宫颈癌筛查计划:一项集群随机对照试验。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Jul;63(7):510-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.077636. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
3
Text messages to increase attendance to follow-up cervical cancer screening appointments among HPV-positive Tanzanian women (Connected2Care): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.通过短信提高坦桑尼亚HPV阳性女性宫颈癌筛查后续预约的出勤率(Connected2Care):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Nov 21;18(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2215-x.
4
Reminder systems to improve patient adherence to tuberculosis clinic appointments for diagnosis and treatment.改善患者对结核病诊断和治疗门诊预约依从性的提醒系统。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 18;2014(11):CD006594. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006594.pub3.
5
Cervical cancer screening: a prospective cohort study of the effects of historical patient compliance and a population-based informatics prompted reminder on screening rates.宫颈癌筛查:一项关于既往患者依从性及基于人群的信息学提示对筛查率影响的前瞻性队列研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Apr;20(2):136-43. doi: 10.1111/jep.12098. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
6
Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.邀请函和提醒信对有组织筛查项目中宫颈癌筛查参与率的影响。
Prev Med. 2016 Jul;88:230-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.04.019. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
7
Effect of second timed appointments for non-attenders of breast cancer screening in England: a randomised controlled trial.英国针对未参加乳腺癌筛查者的第二次定时预约的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):972-980. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30340-6. Epub 2017 May 15.
8
[Self-sampling and reminder letters increase participation in the Finnish cervical cancer screening programme].[自我采样和提醒信可提高芬兰宫颈癌筛查计划的参与率]
Duodecim. 2013;129(16):1709-17.
9
Impact of Patient Reminders on Papanicolaou Test Completion for High-Risk Patients Identified by a Clinical Decision Support System.临床决策支持系统识别的高危患者的患者提醒对巴氏试验完成情况的影响。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 May;27(5):569-574. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6667. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
10
Participation in breast cancer screening: randomised controlled trials of doctors' letters and of telephone reminders.参与乳腺癌筛查:医生信件和电话提醒的随机对照试验。
Aust J Public Health. 1994 Sep;18(3):290-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1994.tb00247.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The new NHS England 'ping and book' screening service is set to exclude thousands of women.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)新推出的“弹窗预约”筛查服务将导致数千名女性被排除在外。
J Med Screen. 2025 Jun;32(2):106-107. doi: 10.1177/09691413251316429. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
2
Co-designing a recruitment strategy for lung cancer screening in high-risk individuals: protocol for a mixed-methods study.共同设计高危个体肺癌筛查的招募策略:一项混合方法研究的方案
HRB Open Res. 2023 Nov 13;6:64. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13793.1. eCollection 2023.
3
Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland-Falster Health Study, Denmark.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing among Non-Attenders Increases Attendance to the Norwegian Cervical Cancer Screening Programme.非参检者中进行人乳头瘤病毒检测的自我采样可提高挪威宫颈癌筛查计划的参检率。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 13;11(4):e0151978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151978. eCollection 2016.
2
Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening.定时与非定时二次预约在提高乳腺癌筛查参与率方面的有效性。
J Med Screen. 2016 Sep;23(3):160-3. doi: 10.1177/0969141315624937. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
3
Reaching women who do not participate in the regular cervical cancer screening programme by offering self-sampling kits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.
社会经济、生活方式和生物学决定因素对宫颈筛查覆盖率的影响:丹麦洛兰-法尔斯特健康研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Aug 1;33(4):568-573. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad091.
4
Questioning 'Informed Choice' in Medical Screening: The Role of Neoliberal Rhetoric, Culture, and Social Context.质疑医学筛查中的“知情选择”:新自由主义修辞、文化和社会背景的作用
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 26;11(9):1230. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091230.
5
The impact of influences in a medical screening programme invitation: a randomized controlled trial.医学筛查项目邀请中影响因素的作用:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Jun 1;33(3):509-514. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad067.
6
Uptake of invitations to a lung health check offering low-dose CT lung cancer screening among an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse population at risk of lung cancer in the UK (SUMMIT): a prospective, longitudinal cohort study.在英国,一项针对具有肺癌风险的、种族和社会经济背景多样化人群的、提供低剂量 CT 肺癌筛查的肺部健康检查邀请参与情况的前瞻性纵向队列研究(SUMMIT):一项针对具有肺癌风险的、种族和社会经济背景多样化人群的、提供低剂量 CT 肺癌筛查的肺部健康检查邀请参与情况的前瞻性纵向队列研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Feb;8(2):e130-e140. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00258-4.
7
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening indicators in a Spanish population-based program: a cohort study.COVID-19 大流行对西班牙基于人群的乳腺癌筛查指标的影响:一项队列研究。
Elife. 2022 Jun 10;11:e77434. doi: 10.7554/eLife.77434.
8
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
9
Young Danish HPV vaccinated women's knowledge, barriers and facilitators towards cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study.丹麦年轻接种人乳头瘤病毒疫苗女性对宫颈癌筛查的认知、障碍及促进因素:一项定性研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Jul 29;24:101507. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101507. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
Offering an app to book cervical screening appointments: A service evaluation.提供预约宫颈癌筛查的应用程序:服务评估。
J Med Screen. 2020 Jun;27(2):85-89. doi: 10.1177/0969141319871312. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
通过提供自我采样试剂盒来接触不参与常规宫颈癌筛查计划的女性:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(16):2375-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
4
Improving cervical cancer screening attendance in Finland.提高芬兰宫颈癌筛查参与率。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 15;136(6):E677-84. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29176. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
5
Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis.人乳头瘤病毒自我采集与临床医生采集样本检测的准确性:荟萃分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):172-83. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70570-9. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
6
Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.提高参与组织性筛查计划的方法:系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 13;13:464. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-464.
7
How to increase uptake in oncologic screening: a systematic review of studies comparing population-based screening programs and spontaneous access.如何提高肿瘤筛查的参与度:基于人群的筛查计划与自发就诊比较的系统评价研究
Prev Med. 2012 Dec;55(6):587-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
8
Mortality audit of the Finnish cervical cancer screening program.芬兰宫颈癌筛查项目的死亡率审核。
Int J Cancer. 2013 May 1;132(9):2134-40. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27844. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
9
High-risk HPV testing on self-sampled versus clinician-collected specimens: a review on the clinical accuracy and impact on population attendance in cervical cancer screening.基于自我采样与临床医生采集样本的高危型 HPV 检测:对宫颈癌筛查中临床准确性和人群参与度影响的综述。
Int J Cancer. 2013 May 15;132(10):2223-36. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27790. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
10
Age-specific effectiveness of the Finnish cervical cancer screening programme.芬兰宫颈癌筛查计划的年龄特异性效果。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Aug;21(8):1354-61. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0162. Epub 2012 Jun 4.