Phimpraphai Waraphon, Tangkawattana Sirikachorn, Sereerak Piya, Kasemsuwan Suwicha, Sripa Banchob
Department of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand; WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Control of Opisthorchiasis (Southeast Asian Liver Fluke Disease)/Tropical Disease Research Center (TDRC), Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Acta Trop. 2017 May;169:150-156. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
Consumption of raw fish is a well-documented risk factor for Opisthorchis viverrini infection. Sharing of food, especially raw fish recipes may influence the spread of disease through a community. Using social network analysis of an ego network, we investigated food sharing among households in an Opisthorchis-endemic area. Network centrality properties were used to explain the differences in O. viverrini transmission and control between villages with a low and high prevalence of infection. Information on demography and O. viverrini infection in 2008 from villagers in the Lawa Lake area was extracted from the Tropical Disease Research Center database. The two villages that had the lowest and the highest O. viverrini infection at the household level were recruited. Ten percent of households of each village were randomly sampled. Participatory epidemiology and face-to-face structured interviews guided by a social network questionnaire were used to collect data on livelihood, agricultural patterns, food sources, raw fish eating habits, and other food sharing during daily life and social gatherings. The number of contacts including in-degree and out-degree varied from 0 to 7 in the low-infection village and 0 to 4 in the high-infection village. The mean number of contacts for the food-sharing network among the low- and high-infection villages was 1.64 and 0.73 contacts per household, respectively. Between these villages, the mean number of out-degree (p=0.0125), but not in-degree (p=0.065), was significantly different. Food-sharing differed in numbers of sharing-in and sharing-out between the two villages. Network analysis of food sharing may be of value in designing strategies for opisthorchiasis control at the community level.
食用生鱼是华支睾吸虫感染的一个有充分文献记载的风险因素。食物共享,尤其是生鱼食谱,可能会影响疾病在社区中的传播。通过对自我网络进行社会网络分析,我们调查了华支睾吸虫流行地区家庭之间的食物共享情况。网络中心性属性被用来解释感染率低和高的村庄在华支睾吸虫传播与控制方面的差异。2008年来自拉瓦湖地区村民的人口统计学和华支睾吸虫感染信息从热带疾病研究中心数据库中提取。招募了家庭层面华支睾吸虫感染率最低和最高的两个村庄。每个村庄随机抽取10%的家庭。采用参与性流行病学方法,并以社会网络问卷为指导进行面对面结构化访谈,以收集关于生计、农业模式、食物来源、生鱼食用习惯以及日常生活和社交聚会中其他食物共享情况的数据。在低感染村庄,包括入度和出度在内的接触次数在0至7之间,在高感染村庄为0至4。低感染村庄和高感染村庄食物共享网络的平均接触次数分别为每户1.64次和0.73次。在这些村庄之间,平均出度(p = 0.0125)有显著差异,但入度(p = 0.065)没有显著差异。两个村庄在共享入和共享出的数量上的食物共享情况有所不同。食物共享的网络分析可能对设计社区层面华支睾吸虫病控制策略有价值。