Weintraub Michael I, Colello Anna D, Johnson Samantha A, McClellan Fabienne, Cole Steven P, Benesch Curtis, Rudolph Steven H, Levine Steven R
Department of Neurology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York.
Stroke and Cardiac Services, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Jun;26(6):1274-1279. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.01.021. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
Our objective was to assess informed consent procedures for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute stroke among New York State (NYS) Department of Health (DOH) designated stroke centers.
A 13-question survey stratified by 0- to 3-hour and 3.0- to 4.5-hour treatment windows was used to determine the type of consent or if no consent was required.
Of the 117 hospitals, 111 responded (95%). All 111 hospitals provided treatment within the 3-hour window, whereas 97 (87%) provided treatment beyond the 3-hour window (P < .001). For hospitals that did provide treatment, there was a difference between the percentages of hospitals requiring consent (verbal or written) within 3 hours (82%) and beyond 3 hours (92%) (P = .04). Of the hospitals requiring consent, there was a difference in the type of consent: 31 of 91 (34%) required written consent within the 3-hour window, whereas 57 of 89 (64%) required written consent beyond the 3-hour window (P < .001). Within both treatment windows, 98% accepted a health-care proxy or surrogate in lieu of the patient. Of the hospitals with less than 500 beds, 11 of 81 (14%) did not require consent within the 3-hour treatment window, compared to hospitals with 500 or more beds where 9 of 30 (30%) did not require consent within the 3-hour treatment window (P < .05). Beyond the 3-hour treatment window, hospitals with more than 500 beds required written consent-2-fold increase "compared to less than 3 hour window" (P < .05). Fifty-five percent of the hospitals were academic, whereas 45% were nonacademic. Academic status was not related to the type of consent in either window.
Significant variability exists in the types of informed consent based on hospital bed size and treatment windows across NYS DOH designated stroke centers.
我们的目的是评估纽约州卫生部(DOH)指定的卒中中心针对急性卒中患者静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的知情同意程序。
采用一份包含13个问题的调查问卷,按0至3小时和3.0至4.5小时的治疗时间窗进行分层,以确定同意的类型或是否无需同意。
117家医院中,111家做出回应(95%)。所有111家医院都在3小时时间窗内提供治疗,而97家(87%)在3小时时间窗之外提供治疗(P <.001)。对于确实提供治疗的医院,3小时内需要同意(口头或书面)的医院百分比(82%)与3小时后需要同意的医院百分比(92%)之间存在差异(P = 0.04)。在需要同意的医院中,同意类型存在差异:91家医院中的31家(34%)在3小时时间窗内需要书面同意,而89家医院中的57家(64%)在3小时时间窗之后需要书面同意(P <.001)。在两个治疗时间窗内,98%的医院接受医疗代理人或替代者代替患者。在床位少于500张的医院中,81家医院中的11家(14%)在3小时治疗时间窗内无需同意,而在床位为500张或更多的医院中,30家医院中的9家(30%)在3小时治疗时间窗内无需同意(P <.05)。在3小时治疗时间窗之后,床位超过500张的医院需要书面同意的比例比3小时时间窗内“增加了两倍”(P <.05)。55%的医院是学术性医院,而45%是非学术性医院。学术地位与两个时间窗内的同意类型均无关。
在纽约州卫生部指定的卒中中心,基于医院床位规模和治疗时间窗,知情同意的类型存在显著差异。