Galbiati Valentina, Papale Angela, Marinovich Marina, Gibbs Sue, Roggen Erwin, Corsini Emanuela
Laboratory of Toxicology, DiSFeB, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Department of Dermatology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Oral Cell Biology, ACTA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Toxicol Lett. 2017 Apr 5;271:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.01.016. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
No standardized in vitro methods to assess potency of skin sensitizers are available. Recently, we standardized a procedure which combines the epidermal equivalent potency assay with assessment of IL-18 to provide a single test for identification and classification of skin sensitizers. This current study aimed to extend tested chemicals, and to provide a simple in vitro method for estimation of the expected sensitization induction level interpolating in vitro EC50 and IL-18 SI2 values to predict LLNA EC3 and/or human NOEL from standards curves generated using reference contact allergens. Reconstituted human epidermis was challenged with 14 chemicals not previously tested benzoquinone, chlorpromazine, chloramine T, benzyl salicylate, diethyl maleate, dihydroeugenol, 2,4-dichloronitrobenzene, benzyl cinnamate, imidazolidinyl urea, and limonene as contact sensitizers while benzyl alcohol, isopropanol, dimethyl isophthalate and 4-aminobenzoic acid as non-sensitizers in the LLNA. Where for benzyl salicylate and benzyl cinnamate no sensitization was observed in human predictive studies, positive responses to benzyl alcohol and dimethyl isophthalate were reported. The proposed method correlates better with human data, correctly predicting substances incorrectly classified by LLNA. With the exception of benzoquinone (interference with both MTT and IL-18 ELISA), and chloramine T (underestimated in the interpolation), a good estimation of LLNA EC3 and in vivo available human NOEL values was obtained.
目前尚无标准化的体外方法来评估皮肤致敏剂的效力。最近,我们标准化了一种程序,该程序将表皮等效效力测定与IL-18评估相结合,以提供一种用于鉴定和分类皮肤致敏剂的单一测试。本研究旨在扩展受试化学品范围,并提供一种简单的体外方法,通过将体外EC50和IL-18 SI2值内插到使用参考接触性变应原生成的标准曲线中来估计预期的致敏诱导水平,从而预测LLNA EC3和/或人体无明显有害作用水平(NOEL)。用14种先前未测试的化学品对重组人表皮进行刺激,其中苯醌、氯丙嗪、氯胺T、水杨酸苄酯、马来酸二乙酯、二氢丁香酚、2,4-二氯硝基苯、肉桂酸苄酯、咪唑烷基脲和柠檬烯作为接触性致敏剂,而苯甲醇、异丙醇、间苯二甲酸二甲酯和对氨基苯甲酸作为LLNA中的非致敏剂。在人体预测性研究中,水杨酸苄酯和肉桂酸苄酯未观察到致敏现象,但有报道称对苯甲醇和间苯二甲酸二甲酯有阳性反应。所提出的方法与人体数据的相关性更好,能够正确预测被LLNA错误分类的物质。除了苯醌(对MTT和IL-18 ELISA均有干扰)和氯胺T(在内插法中被低估)外,对LLNA EC3和体内可用的人体NOEL值进行了良好的估计。