Suppr超能文献

0.5%噻吗洛尔乳膏与595纳米脉冲染料激光治疗增殖期浅表性婴儿血管瘤的前瞻性、开放标签、评估者盲法和自身对照的试点研究

Prospective, open-label, rater-blinded and self-controlled pilot study of the treatment of proliferating superficial infantile hemangiomas with 0.5% topical timolol cream versus 595-nm pulsed dye laser.

作者信息

Ying Hanru, Zou Yun, Yu Wenxin, Qiu Yajing, Ma Gang, Chang Lei, Gu Yifei, Lyu Dongze, Lin Xiaoxi

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Dermatol. 2017 Jun;44(6):660-665. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.13747. Epub 2017 Feb 13.

Abstract

Topical timolol and 595-nm pulsed dye laser (PDL) are both widely used in the treatment of superficial infantile hemangiomas (IH). However, to date, there is no reliable study comparing the therapeutic outcomes between the two treatment options. We designed the present study to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of timolol cream and PDL in the treatment of superficial proliferating IH. Twenty-one patients with superficial IH were included in the study. Each lesion was divided into two regions; one part was treated with 0.5% topical timolol cream four times daily, and the other part was treated monthly with PDL. Both treatments were continued for 2-6 months. Five independent and blinded assessors were asked to judge the results in both the topical timolol-treated and PDL-treated parts by comparing photographs taken before and after treatment. Both treatments resulted in significant clinical improvements after 3.39 sessions in the 2-month follow up. The average visual evaluation showed that PDL had significantly better results than topical timolol (6.55 ± 2.26 to 4.98 ± 2.92, P < 0.01). No patients experienced permanent side-effects during the treatment. Our short-term study revealed that PDL had better results compared with topical timolol cream application in the treatment of superficial proliferating IH. Further studies with longer follow-up time and larger sample size are required to validate our findings.

摘要

局部用噻吗洛尔和595纳米脉冲染料激光(PDL)均广泛用于治疗浅表性婴儿血管瘤(IH)。然而,迄今为止,尚无可靠研究比较这两种治疗方案的治疗效果。我们设计了本研究,以评估和比较噻吗洛尔乳膏和PDL治疗浅表增殖性IH的疗效和安全性。21例浅表性IH患者纳入本研究。每个病灶分为两个区域;一部分每天4次外用0.5%噻吗洛尔乳膏治疗,另一部分每月接受PDL治疗。两种治疗均持续2 - 6个月。5名独立且不知情的评估者被要求通过比较治疗前后拍摄的照片来判断噻吗洛尔局部治疗和PDL治疗部位的结果。在2个月的随访中,经过3.39次治疗后,两种治疗均导致显著的临床改善。平均视觉评估显示,PDL的效果明显优于局部用噻吗洛尔(6.55±2.26对4.98±2.92,P<0.01)。治疗期间无患者出现永久性副作用。我们的短期研究表明,在治疗浅表增殖性IH方面,PDL比外用噻吗洛尔乳膏效果更好。需要进行随访时间更长、样本量更大的进一步研究来验证我们的发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验