Collier Elizabeth S, Lawson Rebecca
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Liverpool.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Apr;43(4):749-769. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000331. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
Linkenauger, Witt, and Proffitt (2011) found that the perceived size of graspable objects was scaled by perceived grasping capacity. However, it is possible that this effect occurred because object size was estimated on the same trial as grasping capacity. This may have led to a conflation of estimates of perceived action capacity and spatial properties. In 5 experiments, we tested Linkenauger et al.'s claim that right-handed observers overestimate the grasping capacity of their right hand relative to their left hand, and that this, in turn, leads them to underestimate the size of objects to-be-grasped in their right hand relative to their left hand. We replicated the finding that right handers overestimate the size and grasping capacity of their right hand relative to their left hand. However, when estimates of object size and grasping capacity were made in separate tasks, objects grasped in the right hand were not underestimated relative to those grasped in the left hand. Further, when grasping capacity was physically restricted, observers appropriately recalibrated their perception of their maximum grasp but estimates of object size were unaffected. Our results suggest that changes in action capacity may not influence perceived object size if sources of conflation are controlled for. (PsycINFO Database Record
林克瑙格、维特和普罗菲特(2011年)发现,可抓握物体的感知大小是根据感知抓握能力来缩放的。然而,这种效应有可能是因为在与抓握能力相同的试验中对物体大小进行了估计才出现的。这可能导致了对感知行动能力和空间属性估计的混淆。在5个实验中,我们检验了林克瑙格等人的说法,即右利手观察者相对于左手高估了右手的抓握能力,而这反过来又导致他们相对于左手低估了右手要抓握物体的大小。我们重复了这一发现,即右利手相对于左手高估了右手的大小和抓握能力。然而,当在单独的任务中对物体大小和抓握能力进行估计时,右手抓握的物体相对于左手抓握的物体并没有被低估。此外,当抓握能力受到实际限制时,观察者会适当地重新校准他们对最大抓握能力的感知,但物体大小的估计并未受到影响。我们的结果表明,如果控制了混淆因素,行动能力的变化可能不会影响对物体大小的感知。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》