Cañal-Bruland Rouwen, van der Kamp John
Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Institute for Human Performance, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Iperception. 2015 Apr;6(2):63-66. doi: 10.1068/i0709jc. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
Proffitt's embodied approach to perception is deeply indebted to Gibson's ecological approach to visual perception, in particular the idea that the primary objects of perception are affordances or what the environment offers for action. Yet, rather than directly addressing affordance perception, most of the empirical work evaluating Proffitt's approach focuses on the perception of spatial properties of the environment. We propose that theoretical and empirical efforts should be directed toward an understanding of the relationship between affordance perception and spatial perception, keeping in mind that this relationship is nontrivial because affordance perception is dichotomous, whereas the perception of spatial properties is gradual. We argue that the perception of spatial properties of the environment is enslaved by affordance perception, most notably at the critical boundaries for action. To empirically scrutinize this proposition, and to solve issues raised regarding the validity of several empirical findings, we call for joint research efforts to further understanding of embodied perception.
普罗菲特的具身知觉方法深受吉布森视觉知觉生态方法的影响,尤其是那种认为知觉的主要对象是可供性或环境为行动所提供的东西的观点。然而,评估普罗菲特方法的大多数实证研究并没有直接探讨可供性知觉,而是聚焦于环境空间属性的知觉。我们建议,理论和实证研究应致力于理解可供性知觉与空间知觉之间的关系,要记住这种关系并非简单,因为可供性知觉是二分的,而空间属性的知觉是渐进的。我们认为,环境空间属性的知觉受可供性知觉的支配,在行动的关键边界处尤为明显。为了从实证角度审视这一命题,并解决有关若干实证研究结果有效性所引发的问题,我们呼吁开展联合研究,以进一步理解具身知觉。