• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抑制控制的实时变异性是否会驱动零食行为?一项密集纵向研究。

Does real time variability in inhibitory control drive snacking behavior? An intensive longitudinal study.

作者信息

Powell Daniel J H, McMinn David, Allan Julia L

机构信息

Rowett Institute of Nutrition and Health.

Health Psychology, Institute of Applied Health Sciences.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 2017 Apr;36(4):356-364. doi: 10.1037/hea0000471. Epub 2017 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1037/hea0000471
PMID:28192005
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Laboratory eating studies and cross-sectional surveys indicate individuals with inefficient executive function (EF) consume more unhealthy snacks than others. However, the importance of EF in determining snacking behavior in the "real world" has not been established. Contemporary behavioral and self-control theories posit EF as a dynamic resource fluctuating over time. Consequently, a test of the relevance of EF to behavior within individuals is required. This study tested within- and between-person effects of real-time variability in objectively measured inhibitory control (a core facet of EF) on subsequent snacking behavior in daily life.

METHOD

A community sample of 64 adults recorded snacking behavior and completed a short Go/No-Go test (assessing inhibitory control) hourly over 7 consecutive days, yielding a total well-powered sample of 6,284 data-points. Generalized linear mixed models using lagged effects examined within-person and between-person effects of inhibitory control efficiency on snacking behavior.

RESULTS

When Go/No-Go test responses were 100 ms slower than the person-mean (indicating periods of poorer inhibitory control), snack consumption in the following hour was 25.67% higher, Exp (γ) = 1.26, p = .002, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.06, 1.49]. Between-individuals, person-mean reaction time (RT) did not predict snack consumption, Exp (γ) = 1.02, p = .965, 95% CI [0.71, 1.46].

CONCLUSIONS

RT variability in inhibitory control efficiency is highly relevant to snacking behavior within individuals. Inhibitory control is an important driver of snacking in everyday life and an important target for interventions. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

目的

实验室饮食研究和横断面调查表明,执行功能(EF)低效的个体比其他人摄入更多不健康零食。然而,EF在“现实世界”中决定零食行为的重要性尚未确立。当代行为和自我控制理论认为EF是一种随时间波动的动态资源。因此,需要测试EF与个体内行为的相关性。本研究测试了客观测量的抑制控制(EF的一个核心方面)的实时变异性对个体随后日常生活中零食行为的个体内和个体间效应。

方法

64名成年人的社区样本记录了零食行为,并在连续7天内每小时完成一次简短的Go/No-Go测试(评估抑制控制),从而获得了一个总样本量充足的6284个数据点。使用滞后效应的广义线性混合模型检验了抑制控制效率对零食行为的个体内和个体间效应。

结果

当Go/No-Go测试反应比个体均值慢100毫秒时(表明抑制控制较差的时期),接下来一小时内的零食摄入量高出25.67%,Exp(γ)=1.26,p=.002,95%置信区间(CI)[1.06,1.49]。在个体之间,个体平均反应时间(RT)不能预测零食摄入量,Exp(γ)=1.02,p=.965,95%CI[0.71,1.46]。

结论

抑制控制效率的RT变异性与个体内的零食行为高度相关。抑制控制是日常生活中零食摄入的重要驱动因素,也是干预的重要目标。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

相似文献

1
Does real time variability in inhibitory control drive snacking behavior? An intensive longitudinal study.抑制控制的实时变异性是否会驱动零食行为?一项密集纵向研究。
Health Psychol. 2017 Apr;36(4):356-364. doi: 10.1037/hea0000471. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
2
The moderating role of state inhibitory control in the effect of evaluative conditioning on temptation and unhealthy snacking.状态抑制控制在评价性条件作用对诱惑和不健康零食摄入影响中的调节作用。
Physiol Behav. 2015 Dec 1;152(Pt A):135-42. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.09.020. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
3
Personal and situational predictors of everyday snacking: An application of temporal self-regulation theory.个体和情境因素对日常零食消费的预测:时间自我调节理论的应用。
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 Nov;22(4):854-871. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12259. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
4
Feeding styles, parenting styles and snacking behaviour in children attending primary schools in multiethnic neighbourhoods: a cross-sectional study.多民族社区小学儿童的喂养方式、育儿方式和零食行为:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 13;7(7):e015495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015495.
5
Socio-economic and demographic factors associated with snacking behavior in a large sample of French adults.与法国成年人大量样本中吃零食行为相关的社会经济和人口统计学因素。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Mar 15;15(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0655-7.
6
The SNAPSHOT study protocol: SNAcking, Physical activity, Self-regulation, and Heart rate Over Time.SNAPSHOT研究方案:随时间推移的零食摄入、身体活动、自我调节和心率
BMC Public Health. 2014 Sep 26;14:1006. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1006.
7
Psychological predictors of opportunistic snacking in the absence of hunger.非饥饿状态下机会性进食的心理预测因素。
Eat Behav. 2015 Aug;18:156-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
8
Mind the Gap? An Intensive Longitudinal Study of Between-Person and Within-Person Intention-Behavior Relations.注意差距?一项关于个体间和个体内意图-行为关系的密集纵向研究。
Ann Behav Med. 2016 Aug;50(4):516-22. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9776-x.
9
Exploring the directionality in the relationship between descriptive and injunctive parental and peer norms and snacking behavior in a three-year-cross-lagged study.在一项为期三年的交叉滞后研究中探索描述性和命令性父母和同伴规范与零食行为之间的关系方向性。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Jun 15;17(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00977-w.
10
It's the power of food: individual differences in food cue responsiveness and snacking in everyday life.这就是食物的力量:日常生活中食物线索反应性和吃零食的个体差异。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Dec 7;12:149. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0312-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Food Inhibitory Control and Reward Responsiveness in Healthy Aging.健康老龄化中的食物抑制控制与奖励反应性
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 Jun 10;80(7). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaf087.
2
Recent advances in understanding how compulsivity is related to behavioural addictions over their timecourse.在理解强迫性如何在其时间进程中与行为成瘾相关方面的最新进展。
Curr Addict Rep. 2025;12(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s40429-025-00621-2. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
3
Within-subject reliability, occasion specificity, and validity of fluctuations of the Stroop and go/no-go tasks in ecological momentary assessment.
生态瞬时评估中Stroop任务和停止-继续任务波动的受试者内信度、情境特异性及效度
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 28;57(1):29. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02567-1.
4
Naturalistic assessments across the lifespan: Systematic review of inhibition measures in ecological settings.毕生的自然主义评估:生态环境中抑制措施的系统评价。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Dec;167:105915. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105915. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
5
Neural and Behavioral Correlates of Binge Eating in 9- to 10-Year-Old Children.9至10岁儿童暴饮暴食的神经及行为关联
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;64(4):475-487. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2024.07.925. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
6
The Relationship between Executive Functions and Body Weight: Sex as a Moderating Variable.执行功能与体重之间的关系:性别作为调节变量
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Mar 21;14(3):258. doi: 10.3390/bs14030258.
7
Intraindividual variability in post-stroke cognition and its relationship with activities of daily living and social functioning: an ecological momentary assessment approach.中风后认知的个体内变异性及其与日常生活活动和社会功能的关系:一种生态瞬时评估方法。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2024 Sep;31(6):564-575. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2024.2307203. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
8
Inhibitory control and mood in relation to psychological resilience: an ecological momentary assessment study.抑制控制与情绪和心理弹性的关系:一项生态瞬间评估研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 12;13(1):13151. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40242-1.
9
Daily ovarian hormone exposure and loss of control eating in adolescent girls: A registered report.日常卵巢激素暴露与青少年女性失控性进食的关系:一项注册报告。
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Jun;56(6):1246-1253. doi: 10.1002/eat.23962. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
10
Higher general executive functions predicts lower body mass index by mitigating avoidance behaviors.较高的一般执行功能通过减轻回避行为来预测较低的身体质量指数。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 9;13:1048363. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1048363. eCollection 2022.