Communication Science, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University and Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Jun 15;17(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00977-w.
People's eating behavior is assumed to be influenced by what other people do (perceived descriptive norms) and what others approve of (perceived injunctive norms). It has been suggested that adolescents are more susceptible to peer norms than parental norms, because they experience a strong need for group acceptance that leads to conforming to peer group norms. The current study examined changes in snacking behavior and four types of social norms (i.e., parental and peer descriptive and injunctive norms) that promoted fruit and vegetable intake among adolescents. This study was the first to examine whether snacking behavior also influenced norm perceptions by testing the directionality of these associations.
The study consisted of 819 participants (M [SD] age = 11.19 [1.36]; 46.1% boys), collected at three time points (T1 = 2016, T2 = 2017 and T3 = 2018) during the MyMovez project. Self-reported frequency of snack consumption, perceived parental and peer descriptive and injunctive norms were assessed. The primary analysis consisted of a series of cross-lagged autoregressive models specified in a structural equation modeling framework.
Model comparisons testing the descriptive and injunctive norms in separate models and in an additional combined model revealed evidence for bi-directional associations between norms and snacking behavior. Descriptive peer and parent norms were not found to have an effect on subsequent snacking behaviors. Perceived injunctive parental norms were positively associated with healthy snack food intake and negatively associated with unhealthy snack intake (forward direction). Injunctive peer norms were negatively associated with healthy snack food intake. In addition, higher unhealthy snack food intake was negatively associated with the perception of descriptive and injunctive parental norms 1 year later (reversed direction). We did not find peer norms to be more closely associated with changes in snacking behaviors compared to parental norms.
Parents expecting their children to snack healthy had a positive influence on healthy snacking behavior whereas only acting as a healthy role model did not. Future research should address the possible interaction between descriptive and injunctive norms. Research should also take into account the bi-directional relations between eating behaviors and normative perceptions.
人们的饮食习惯被认为受到他人行为(感知描述性规范)和他人认可(感知规范性规范)的影响。有人认为,青少年比父母规范更容易受到同伴规范的影响,因为他们强烈需要群体接纳,这导致他们遵守同伴群体规范。本研究考察了促进青少年摄入水果和蔬菜的零食行为和四种类型的社会规范(即父母和同伴的描述性和规范性规范)的变化。这项研究首次通过测试这些关联的方向性来检验零食行为是否也会影响规范认知,从而检验了这些关联的方向。
该研究包括 819 名参与者(M [SD] 年龄=11.19 [1.36];46.1% 为男孩),在 MyMovez 项目期间在三个时间点(T1=2016 年,T2=2017 年和 T3=2018 年)收集。自我报告的零食消费频率、感知父母和同伴的描述性和规范性规范。主要分析包括在结构方程模型框架中指定的一系列交叉滞后自回归模型。
模型比较测试了单独模型和附加组合模型中的描述性和规范性规范,结果表明规范和零食行为之间存在双向关联的证据。同伴和父母的描述性规范并没有对随后的零食行为产生影响。感知到的父母规范性规范与健康零食摄入呈正相关,与不健康零食摄入呈负相关(正向)。同伴规范性规范与健康零食摄入呈负相关。此外,更高的不健康零食摄入与 1 年后感知到的描述性和规范性父母规范呈负相关(反向)。我们没有发现同伴规范与零食行为变化的关联比父母规范更密切。
期望孩子健康零食的父母对健康零食行为有积极影响,而仅仅作为健康榜样则没有。未来的研究应该解决描述性和规范性规范之间可能存在的相互作用。研究还应考虑到饮食行为和规范认知之间的双向关系。