Schmalenberger K M, Eisenlohr-Moul T A, Surana P, Rubinow D R, Girdler S S
Heidelberg University, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,Chapel Hill, NC,USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,Chapel Hill, NC,USA.
Psychol Med. 2017 Jul;47(9):1585-1596. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716003524. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
Women who experience significant premenstrual symptoms differ in the extent to which these symptoms cause cyclical impairment. This study clarifies the type and number of symptoms that best predict premenstrual impairment in a sample of women undergoing prospective assessment for premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) in a research setting. Central research goals were to determine (1) which emotional, psychological, and physical symptoms of PMDD are uniquely associated with premenstrual impairment, and (2) how many cyclical symptoms optimally predict the presence of a clinically significant premenstrual elevation of impairment.
A total of 267 naturally cycling women recruited for retrospective report of premenstrual emotional symptoms completed daily symptom reports using the Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP) and occupational, recreational, and relational impairment for 1-4 menstrual cycles (N = 563 cycles).
Multilevel regression revealed that emotional, psychological, and physical symptoms differ in their associations with impairment. The core emotional symptoms of PMDD were predictors of impairment, but not after accounting for secondary psychological symptoms, which were the most robust predictors. The optimal number of premenstrual symptoms for predicting clinically significant premenstrual impairment was four.
Results enhance our understanding of the type and number of premenstrual symptoms associated with premenstrual impairment among women being evaluated for PMDD in research contexts. Additional work is needed to determine whether cognitive symptoms should receive greater attention in the study of PMDD, and to revisit the usefulness of the five-symptom diagnostic threshold.
经历显著经前症状的女性在这些症状导致周期性功能损害的程度上存在差异。本研究在研究环境中,对经前烦躁障碍(PMDD)进行前瞻性评估的女性样本中,阐明了最能预测经前功能损害的症状类型和数量。核心研究目标是确定:(1)PMDD的哪些情绪、心理和身体症状与经前功能损害独特相关;(2)多少周期性症状能最佳预测临床上经前功能损害的显著升高。
共有267名自然月经周期的女性参与,她们通过问题严重程度每日记录(DRSP)完成了经前情绪症状的回顾性报告,并报告了1至4个月经周期的职业、娱乐和人际关系方面的功能损害(N = 563个周期)。
多层次回归显示,情绪、心理和身体症状与功能损害的关联各不相同。PMDD的核心情绪症状是功能损害的预测因素,但在考虑次要心理症状后则不然,次要心理症状是最有力的预测因素。预测临床上经前显著功能损害所需的经前症状最佳数量为四个。
研究结果增进了我们对在研究环境中接受PMDD评估的女性中,与经前功能损害相关的经前症状类型和数量的理解。需要进一步开展工作,以确定在PMDD研究中认知症状是否应得到更多关注,并重新审视五症状诊断阈值的实用性。