Rios-Diaz Arturo J, Metcalfe David, Olufajo Olubode A, Zogg Cheryl K, Yorkgitis Brian, Singh Mansher, Haider Adil H, Salim Ali
Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Dec;223(6):764-773.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.08.569. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
The association between the need for trauma care and trauma services has not been characterized previously. We compared the distribution of trauma admissions with state-level availability of trauma centers (TCs), surgical critical care (SCC) providers, and SCC fellowships, and assessed the association between trauma care provision and state-level trauma mortality.
We obtained 2013 state-level data on trauma admissions, TCs, SCC providers, SCC fellowship positions, per-capita income, population size, and age-adjusted mortality rates. Normalized densities (per million population [PMP]) were calculated and generalized linear models were used to test associations between provision of trauma services (higher-level TCs, SCC providers, and SCC fellowship positions) and trauma burden, per-capita income, and age-adjusted mortality rates.
There were 1,345,024 trauma admissions (4,250 PMP), 2,496 SCC providers (7.89 PMP), and 1,987 TCs across the country, of which 521 were Level I or II (1.65 PMP). There was considerable variation between the top 5 and bottom 5 states in terms of Level I/Level II TCs and SCC surgeon availability (approximately 8.0/1.0), despite showing less variation in trauma admission density (1.5/1.0). Distribution of trauma admissions was positively associated with SCC provider density and age-adjusted trauma mortality (p ≤ 0.001), and inversely associated with per-capita income (p < 0.001). Age-adjusted mortality was inversely associated with the number of SCC providers PMP. For every additional SCC provider PMP, there was a decrease of 618 deaths per year.
There is an inequitable distribution of trauma services across the US. Increases in the density of SCC providers are associated with decreases in mortality. There was no association between density of trauma admissions and location of Level I/Level II TCs. In the wake of efforts to regionalize TCs, additional efforts are needed to address disparities in the provision of quality care to trauma patients.
创伤护理需求与创伤服务之间的关联此前尚未得到描述。我们比较了创伤入院病例的分布与各州创伤中心(TC)、外科重症监护(SCC)提供者及SCC奖学金项目的可及性,并评估了创伤护理提供情况与各州创伤死亡率之间的关联。
我们获取了2013年各州关于创伤入院病例、创伤中心、SCC提供者、SCC奖学金名额、人均收入、人口规模及年龄调整死亡率的数据。计算标准化密度(每百万人口[PMP]),并使用广义线性模型来检验创伤服务提供情况(高级别创伤中心、SCC提供者及SCC奖学金名额)与创伤负担、人均收入及年龄调整死亡率之间的关联。
全国共有1345024例创伤入院病例(每百万人口4250例)、2496名SCC提供者(每百万人口7.89名)及1987个创伤中心,其中521个为一级或二级创伤中心(每百万人口1.65个)。尽管创伤入院密度的差异较小(1.5/1.0),但在一级/二级创伤中心及SCC外科医生可及性方面,排名前5和后5的州之间存在相当大的差异(约8.0/1.0)。创伤入院病例的分布与SCC提供者密度及年龄调整创伤死亡率呈正相关(p≤0.001),与人均收入呈负相关(p<0.001)。年龄调整死亡率与每百万人口SCC提供者数量呈负相关。每增加一名每百万人口SCC提供者,每年死亡人数减少618例。
美国各地创伤服务的分布不均衡。SCC提供者密度的增加与死亡率的降低相关。创伤入院密度与一级/二级创伤中心的位置之间没有关联。在努力将创伤中心区域化之后,还需要进一步努力解决创伤患者优质护理提供方面的差异。