Hsia Renee Y, Wang Ewen, Torres Hugo, Saynina Olga, Wise Paul H
University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
J Trauma. 2010 Jan;68(1):217-24. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a0e66d.
Although efforts have been made to address disparities in access to trauma care in the past decade, there is little evidence to show if utilization has changed. We use patient-level data to describe the changes in utilization of trauma centers (TCs) in an 8-year period in California.
We analyzed all statewide trauma admissions (n = 752,706) using the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Discharge Patient Discharge Database from the period of 1999 to 2006, and determined the trends in admissions and place of care.
The proportion of severe injuries admitted increased by 3.6% (p < 0.05), with a concomitant rise in the proportion of patients with trauma to TCs, from 39.3% (95% CI: 39.0%-39.7%) to 49.7% (49.4%-50.0%). Within the severely injured with injury severity scores (ISS) >15, 82.4% were treated in a TC if they resided in a county with a TC, compared with 30.8% of patients who did not live in a county with a TC. After adjustment, patients living greater than 50 miles away from a TC still had a likelihood ratio of 0.11 (p < 0.0001) of receiving care in a TC compared with those less than 10 miles away. Similarly, even severely injured patients not living in a county with a TC had a likelihood ratio of 0.35 (p < 0.0001) of being admitted to a TC compared with those residing in counties with TCs.
Admissions to TCs for all categories of injury severity are increasing. There remains, however, a large disparity in TC care depending on geographical distance and availability of a TC within county.
尽管在过去十年中已努力解决创伤护理可及性方面的差异,但几乎没有证据表明其利用率是否发生了变化。我们使用患者层面的数据来描述加利福尼亚州8年期间创伤中心(TCs)利用率的变化。
我们使用1999年至2006年期间加利福尼亚州全州卫生规划与出院患者数据库,分析了全州所有创伤入院病例(n = 752,706),并确定了入院趋势和护理地点。
重伤入院比例增加了3.6%(p < 0.05),同时创伤患者入住创伤中心的比例也有所上升,从39.3%(95%CI:39.0%-39.7%)升至49.7%(49.4%-50.0%)。在损伤严重程度评分(ISS)>15的重伤患者中,如果他们居住在有创伤中心的县,82.4%在创伤中心接受治疗,而居住在没有创伤中心的县的患者这一比例为30.8%。调整后,与居住在距离创伤中心不到10英里的患者相比,居住在距离创伤中心50英里以上的患者在创伤中心接受护理的可能性比为0.11(p < 0.0001)。同样,即使是居住在没有创伤中心的县的重伤患者,与居住在有创伤中心的县的患者相比,被收治到创伤中心的可能性比为0.35(p < 0.0001)。
各类损伤严重程度的创伤中心入院人数都在增加。然而,根据地理距离和所在县内创伤中心的可及性,创伤中心护理仍存在很大差异。