Suppr超能文献

尽管创伤中心利用率不断提高,但在获取创伤中心服务方面仍存在差异:1999年至2006年加利福尼亚州的数据

Disparities in trauma center access despite increasing utilization: data from California, 1999 to 2006.

作者信息

Hsia Renee Y, Wang Ewen, Torres Hugo, Saynina Olga, Wise Paul H

机构信息

University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2010 Jan;68(1):217-24. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a0e66d.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although efforts have been made to address disparities in access to trauma care in the past decade, there is little evidence to show if utilization has changed. We use patient-level data to describe the changes in utilization of trauma centers (TCs) in an 8-year period in California.

METHODS

We analyzed all statewide trauma admissions (n = 752,706) using the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Discharge Patient Discharge Database from the period of 1999 to 2006, and determined the trends in admissions and place of care.

RESULTS

The proportion of severe injuries admitted increased by 3.6% (p < 0.05), with a concomitant rise in the proportion of patients with trauma to TCs, from 39.3% (95% CI: 39.0%-39.7%) to 49.7% (49.4%-50.0%). Within the severely injured with injury severity scores (ISS) >15, 82.4% were treated in a TC if they resided in a county with a TC, compared with 30.8% of patients who did not live in a county with a TC. After adjustment, patients living greater than 50 miles away from a TC still had a likelihood ratio of 0.11 (p < 0.0001) of receiving care in a TC compared with those less than 10 miles away. Similarly, even severely injured patients not living in a county with a TC had a likelihood ratio of 0.35 (p < 0.0001) of being admitted to a TC compared with those residing in counties with TCs.

CONCLUSION

Admissions to TCs for all categories of injury severity are increasing. There remains, however, a large disparity in TC care depending on geographical distance and availability of a TC within county.

摘要

背景

尽管在过去十年中已努力解决创伤护理可及性方面的差异,但几乎没有证据表明其利用率是否发生了变化。我们使用患者层面的数据来描述加利福尼亚州8年期间创伤中心(TCs)利用率的变化。

方法

我们使用1999年至2006年期间加利福尼亚州全州卫生规划与出院患者数据库,分析了全州所有创伤入院病例(n = 752,706),并确定了入院趋势和护理地点。

结果

重伤入院比例增加了3.6%(p < 0.05),同时创伤患者入住创伤中心的比例也有所上升,从39.3%(95%CI:39.0%-39.7%)升至49.7%(49.4%-50.0%)。在损伤严重程度评分(ISS)>15的重伤患者中,如果他们居住在有创伤中心的县,82.4%在创伤中心接受治疗,而居住在没有创伤中心的县的患者这一比例为30.8%。调整后,与居住在距离创伤中心不到10英里的患者相比,居住在距离创伤中心50英里以上的患者在创伤中心接受护理的可能性比为0.11(p < 0.0001)。同样,即使是居住在没有创伤中心的县的重伤患者,与居住在有创伤中心的县的患者相比,被收治到创伤中心的可能性比为0.35(p < 0.0001)。

结论

各类损伤严重程度的创伤中心入院人数都在增加。然而,根据地理距离和所在县内创伤中心的可及性,创伤中心护理仍存在很大差异。

相似文献

2
Factors associated with trauma center use for elderly patients with trauma: a statewide analysis, 1999-2008.
Arch Surg. 2011 May;146(5):585-92. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.311. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
3
The effect of trauma center care on pediatric injury mortality in California, 1999 to 2011.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Oct;75(4):704-16. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829a0a65.
4
Variability in pediatric utilization of trauma facilities in California: 1999 to 2005.
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;52(6):607-15. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.05.011. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
5
Trauma center versus non-trauma center admissions in adult trauma victims by age and gender.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2004 Jul-Sep;8(3):268-72. doi: 10.1016/j.prehos.2003.12.027.
7
System-Level Variability in Trauma Center Utilization for Seriously Injured Older Adults.
J Surg Res. 2025 Jan;305:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.047. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
8
Geographic Distribution of Trauma Burden, Mortality, and Services in the United States: Does Availability Correspond to Patient Need?
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Dec;223(6):764-773.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.08.569. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
9
Definitive care in level 3 trauma centres after severe injury: A comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes.
Injury. 2015 Sep;46(9):1790-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.047. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
10
Geriatric trauma patients-are they receiving trauma center care?
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Mar;10(3):244-50. doi: 10.1197/aemj.10.3.244.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing re-triage guidelines: A scoping review of states' rules and regulations.
Surgery. 2024 Feb;175(2):522-528. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.10.024. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
2
Re-triage moderates association between state trauma funding and lower mortality of trauma patients.
Injury. 2023 Sep;54(9):110859. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110859. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
3
Incorporating the six aims for quality in the analysis of trauma care.
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2021 Jul 20;11(2):98-108. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2021.1906763. eCollection 2022.
4
CDC field triage criteria accurately predicts outcomes in high impact trauma.
J Inj Violence Res. 2022 Jan;14(1):115-124. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v14i1.1650. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
5
A National Study of Emergency Thoracotomy for Trauma.
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2021 Jan-Mar;14(1):14-17. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_93_20. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
6
Comparison and interpretability of machine learning models to predict severity of chest injury.
JAMIA Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(1):ooab015. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab015. eCollection 2021 Jan.
7
The role of emergency medical service providers in the decision-making process of prehospital trauma triage.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Feb;46(1):131-146. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1006-8. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
8
Distance matters: Effect of geographic trauma system resource organization on fatal motor vehicle collisions.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1):111-118. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001508.
9
Undertriage of Firearm-Related Injuries in a Major Metropolitan Area.
JAMA Surg. 2017 May 1;152(5):467-474. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5049.
10
Variation of Blunt Traumatic Injury with Age in Older Adults: Statewide Analysis 2011-14.
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;17(6):702-708. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.9.31003. Epub 2016 Oct 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in charges and payments for nonhospitalized emergency department pediatric visits, 1996-2003.
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Apr;15(4):347-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00075.x.
3
Decreasing reimbursements for outpatient emergency department visits across payer groups from 1996 to 2004.
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Mar;51(3):265-74, 274.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.08.009. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
5
Epidemiology of geriatric trauma in United Arab Emirates.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2008 Nov-Dec;47(3):377-82. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2007.08.018. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
6
Trauma center utilization for children in California 1998-2004: trends and areas for further analysis.
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;14(4):309-15. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.11.012. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
7
Are we there yet? Distance to care and relative supply among pediatric medical subspecialties.
Pediatrics. 2006 Dec;118(6):2313-21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1570.
9
Variability of trauma transfer practices among non-tertiary care hospital emergency departments.
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jul;13(7):746-54. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.02.014. Epub 2006 May 24.
10
Regional differences in outcomes for hospitalized injured patients.
J Trauma. 2006 Apr;60(4):691-8; discussion 699-700. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000210454.92078.89.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验