• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尽管创伤中心利用率不断提高,但在获取创伤中心服务方面仍存在差异:1999年至2006年加利福尼亚州的数据

Disparities in trauma center access despite increasing utilization: data from California, 1999 to 2006.

作者信息

Hsia Renee Y, Wang Ewen, Torres Hugo, Saynina Olga, Wise Paul H

机构信息

University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2010 Jan;68(1):217-24. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a0e66d.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a0e66d
PMID:19901854
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2805766/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although efforts have been made to address disparities in access to trauma care in the past decade, there is little evidence to show if utilization has changed. We use patient-level data to describe the changes in utilization of trauma centers (TCs) in an 8-year period in California.

METHODS

We analyzed all statewide trauma admissions (n = 752,706) using the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Discharge Patient Discharge Database from the period of 1999 to 2006, and determined the trends in admissions and place of care.

RESULTS

The proportion of severe injuries admitted increased by 3.6% (p < 0.05), with a concomitant rise in the proportion of patients with trauma to TCs, from 39.3% (95% CI: 39.0%-39.7%) to 49.7% (49.4%-50.0%). Within the severely injured with injury severity scores (ISS) >15, 82.4% were treated in a TC if they resided in a county with a TC, compared with 30.8% of patients who did not live in a county with a TC. After adjustment, patients living greater than 50 miles away from a TC still had a likelihood ratio of 0.11 (p < 0.0001) of receiving care in a TC compared with those less than 10 miles away. Similarly, even severely injured patients not living in a county with a TC had a likelihood ratio of 0.35 (p < 0.0001) of being admitted to a TC compared with those residing in counties with TCs.

CONCLUSION

Admissions to TCs for all categories of injury severity are increasing. There remains, however, a large disparity in TC care depending on geographical distance and availability of a TC within county.

摘要

背景

尽管在过去十年中已努力解决创伤护理可及性方面的差异,但几乎没有证据表明其利用率是否发生了变化。我们使用患者层面的数据来描述加利福尼亚州8年期间创伤中心(TCs)利用率的变化。

方法

我们使用1999年至2006年期间加利福尼亚州全州卫生规划与出院患者数据库,分析了全州所有创伤入院病例(n = 752,706),并确定了入院趋势和护理地点。

结果

重伤入院比例增加了3.6%(p < 0.05),同时创伤患者入住创伤中心的比例也有所上升,从39.3%(95%CI:39.0%-39.7%)升至49.7%(49.4%-50.0%)。在损伤严重程度评分(ISS)>15的重伤患者中,如果他们居住在有创伤中心的县,82.4%在创伤中心接受治疗,而居住在没有创伤中心的县的患者这一比例为30.8%。调整后,与居住在距离创伤中心不到10英里的患者相比,居住在距离创伤中心50英里以上的患者在创伤中心接受护理的可能性比为0.11(p < 0.0001)。同样,即使是居住在没有创伤中心的县的重伤患者,与居住在有创伤中心的县的患者相比,被收治到创伤中心的可能性比为0.35(p < 0.0001)。

结论

各类损伤严重程度的创伤中心入院人数都在增加。然而,根据地理距离和所在县内创伤中心的可及性,创伤中心护理仍存在很大差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/527a/2805766/63385d22612b/nihms128842f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/527a/2805766/39b6ff7f427b/nihms128842f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/527a/2805766/7b8f298ac9d7/nihms128842f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/527a/2805766/d19ffd2f47a8/nihms128842f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/527a/2805766/774bc071d544/nihms128842f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/527a/2805766/63385d22612b/nihms128842f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/527a/2805766/39b6ff7f427b/nihms128842f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/527a/2805766/7b8f298ac9d7/nihms128842f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/527a/2805766/d19ffd2f47a8/nihms128842f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/527a/2805766/774bc071d544/nihms128842f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/527a/2805766/63385d22612b/nihms128842f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Disparities in trauma center access despite increasing utilization: data from California, 1999 to 2006.尽管创伤中心利用率不断提高,但在获取创伤中心服务方面仍存在差异:1999年至2006年加利福尼亚州的数据
J Trauma. 2010 Jan;68(1):217-24. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a0e66d.
2
Factors associated with trauma center use for elderly patients with trauma: a statewide analysis, 1999-2008.1999 - 2008年老年创伤患者使用创伤中心的相关因素:一项全州范围的分析
Arch Surg. 2011 May;146(5):585-92. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.311. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
3
The effect of trauma center care on pediatric injury mortality in California, 1999 to 2011.1999 年至 2011 年加利福尼亚州创伤中心护理对儿科伤害死亡率的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Oct;75(4):704-16. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829a0a65.
4
Variability in pediatric utilization of trauma facilities in California: 1999 to 2005.1999年至2005年加利福尼亚州儿科创伤救治机构使用情况的差异
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;52(6):607-15. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.05.011. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
5
Trauma center versus non-trauma center admissions in adult trauma victims by age and gender.按年龄和性别划分的成年创伤受害者在创伤中心与非创伤中心的入院情况。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2004 Jul-Sep;8(3):268-72. doi: 10.1016/j.prehos.2003.12.027.
6
Characteristics of pediatric trauma transfers to a level i trauma center: implications for developing a regionalized pediatric trauma system in california.儿科创伤转送至一级创伤中心的特征:对加利福尼亚州建立区域性儿科创伤系统的启示。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;17(12):1364-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00926.x.
7
System-Level Variability in Trauma Center Utilization for Seriously Injured Older Adults.重伤老年人创伤中心利用的系统层面变异性
J Surg Res. 2025 Jan;305:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.047. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
8
Geographic Distribution of Trauma Burden, Mortality, and Services in the United States: Does Availability Correspond to Patient Need?美国创伤负担、死亡率及服务的地理分布:可及性是否与患者需求相符?
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Dec;223(6):764-773.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.08.569. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
9
Definitive care in level 3 trauma centres after severe injury: A comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes.重伤后三级创伤中心的确定性治疗:临床特征与结局比较
Injury. 2015 Sep;46(9):1790-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.047. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
10
Geriatric trauma patients-are they receiving trauma center care?
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Mar;10(3):244-50. doi: 10.1197/aemj.10.3.244.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing re-triage guidelines: A scoping review of states' rules and regulations.描述重新分类指南的特征:对各州的规则和条例进行的范围综述。
Surgery. 2024 Feb;175(2):522-528. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.10.024. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
2
Re-triage moderates association between state trauma funding and lower mortality of trauma patients.重新分类可缓和州创伤基金与创伤患者死亡率降低之间的关联。
Injury. 2023 Sep;54(9):110859. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110859. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
3
Incorporating the six aims for quality in the analysis of trauma care.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in charges and payments for nonhospitalized emergency department pediatric visits, 1996-2003.1996 - 2003年非住院急诊科儿科就诊的收费及支付趋势
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Apr;15(4):347-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00075.x.
2
Proportion of seriously injured patients admitted to hospitals in the US with a high annual injured patient volume: a metric of regionalized trauma care.美国每年收治重伤患者数量较多的医院中重伤患者的比例:区域创伤护理的一项指标。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Feb;206(2):212-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.08.019. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
3
Decreasing reimbursements for outpatient emergency department visits across payer groups from 1996 to 2004.
在创伤护理分析中纳入六项质量目标。
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2021 Jul 20;11(2):98-108. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2021.1906763. eCollection 2022.
4
CDC field triage criteria accurately predicts outcomes in high impact trauma.疾控中心现场分诊标准准确预测了高影响创伤的结局。
J Inj Violence Res. 2022 Jan;14(1):115-124. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v14i1.1650. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
5
A National Study of Emergency Thoracotomy for Trauma.一项关于创伤性急诊开胸手术的全国性研究。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2021 Jan-Mar;14(1):14-17. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_93_20. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
6
Comparison and interpretability of machine learning models to predict severity of chest injury.用于预测胸部损伤严重程度的机器学习模型的比较与可解释性
JAMIA Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(1):ooab015. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab015. eCollection 2021 Jan.
7
The role of emergency medical service providers in the decision-making process of prehospital trauma triage.紧急医疗服务提供者在院前创伤分诊决策过程中的作用。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Feb;46(1):131-146. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1006-8. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
8
Distance matters: Effect of geographic trauma system resource organization on fatal motor vehicle collisions.距离至关重要:地理创伤系统资源组织对致命机动车碰撞事故的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1):111-118. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001508.
9
Undertriage of Firearm-Related Injuries in a Major Metropolitan Area.大城市地区与枪支相关损伤的分诊不足
JAMA Surg. 2017 May 1;152(5):467-474. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5049.
10
Variation of Blunt Traumatic Injury with Age in Older Adults: Statewide Analysis 2011-14.2011 - 2014年全州范围内老年人钝性创伤性损伤随年龄的变化分析
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;17(6):702-708. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.9.31003. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
1996年至2004年期间,各支付方群体的门诊急诊科就诊报销费用不断减少。
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Mar;51(3):265-74, 274.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.08.009. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
4
The benefit of higher level of care transfer of injured patients from nontertiary hospital emergency departments.将受伤患者从非三级医院急诊科进行更高水平护理转移的益处。
J Trauma. 2007 Nov;63(5):965-71. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31803c5665.
5
Epidemiology of geriatric trauma in United Arab Emirates.阿拉伯联合酋长国老年创伤的流行病学
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2008 Nov-Dec;47(3):377-82. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2007.08.018. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
6
Trauma center utilization for children in California 1998-2004: trends and areas for further analysis.1998 - 2004年加利福尼亚州儿童创伤中心的利用情况:趋势及进一步分析领域
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;14(4):309-15. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.11.012. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
7
Are we there yet? Distance to care and relative supply among pediatric medical subspecialties.我们到了吗?儿科医学亚专业的就医距离与相对供给情况。
Pediatrics. 2006 Dec;118(6):2313-21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1570.
8
The state of US trauma systems: public perceptions versus reality--implications for US response to terrorism and mass casualty events.美国创伤系统的现状:公众认知与现实——对美国应对恐怖主义和大规模伤亡事件的启示
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Dec;203(6):951-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.019.
9
Variability of trauma transfer practices among non-tertiary care hospital emergency departments.非三级护理医院急诊科创伤转运实践的差异
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jul;13(7):746-54. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.02.014. Epub 2006 May 24.
10
Regional differences in outcomes for hospitalized injured patients.住院受伤患者结局的地区差异。
J Trauma. 2006 Apr;60(4):691-8; discussion 699-700. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000210454.92078.89.