Noyes Frank R, Huser Lauren E, Levy Martin S
1Cincinnati Sports Medicine Research and Education Foundation, Cincinnati, Ohio 2The Noyes Knee Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio 3Department of Operations and Business Analytics, College of Business, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Feb 15;99(4):305-314. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00199.
The anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been proposed as a primary restraint for knee rotational stability. However, the data remain inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the ALL and the iliotibial band (ITB) on knee rotational stability.
A 6-degrees-of-freedom robotic simulator was used to test 14 fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens. There were 4 testing conditions: intact, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-sectioned, ACL and ALL or ITB-sectioned (determined at random), and ACL and both ALL and ITB-sectioned. Lateral, central, and medial tibiofemoral compartment translations and internal tibial rotations were measured under 100-N anterior drawer (Lachman), 5-Nm internal rotation torque, and 2 pivot-shift simulations (Pivot Shift 1 was 5 Nm of internal rotation torque, and Pivot Shift 2 was 1 Nm of internal rotation torque). Statistical equivalence within 2 mm and 2° was defined as p < 0.05.
Sectioning the ACL alone produced increased pivot shift and Lachman compartment translations (p > 0.05). Further sectioning of either the ALL or the ITB separately produced minor added increases in pivot-shift compartment translations and tibial internal rotations (<2 mm or <3°) in the ACL-deficient knee. Sectioning both the ALL and ITB produced increases not equivalent to the ACL-deficient knee in pivot-shift lateral compartment translations (4.4 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7 to 6.1 mm [p = 0.99] for Pivot Shift 1 and 4.3 mm; 95% CI, 2.6 to 6.0 mm [p = 0.99] for Pivot Shift 2), with 10 of 14 knees being converted to a corresponding Grade-3 pivot-shift (>20 mm of lateral translation). Increases in internal rotation after ALL and ITB sectioning occurred at 25°, 60°, and 90° (p = 0.99 for all) and ranged from 1° to 12°, with 21% of the knees having 8° to 12° increases.
With ACL sectioning, a positive pivot-shift anterior subluxation occurred even with intact ALL and ITB structures, which indicates that the latter are not primary restraints but function together as anterolateral secondary restraints. With ACL deficiency, concurrent loss of the ALL and ITB resulted in conversion in a majority of knees (71%) to a Grade-3 pivot-shift subluxation, along with major increases of internal rotation in select knees.
With ACL rupture, major increases in rotational instability are not adequately resisted by native ALL or ITB structures. Therefore, anatomic ALL or ITB surgical reconstruction would not block a positive pivot shift. The potential protective effects of ACL graft-unloading from these structures require further study.
前外侧韧带(ALL)被认为是膝关节旋转稳定性的主要限制因素。然而,数据尚无定论。本研究的目的是确定ALL和髂胫束(ITB)对膝关节旋转稳定性的影响。
使用六自由度机器人模拟器测试14个新鲜冷冻尸体膝关节标本。有4种测试条件:完整、前交叉韧带(ACL)切断、ACL和ALL或ITB切断(随机确定),以及ACL和ALL及ITB均切断。在100 N前抽屉试验(拉赫曼试验)、5 N·m内旋扭矩和2次轴移模拟(轴移1为5 N·m内旋扭矩,轴移2为1 N·m内旋扭矩)下测量胫股关节外侧、中央和内侧间室的平移以及胫骨内旋。2 mm和2°范围内的统计学等效性定义为p < 0.05。
单独切断ACL会导致轴移增加和拉赫曼试验间室平移增加(p > 0.05)。在ACL损伤的膝关节中,进一步单独切断ALL或ITB会使轴移间室平移和胫骨内旋略有增加(<2 mm或<3°)。同时切断ALL和ITB会导致轴移外侧间室平移增加,与ACL损伤的膝关节不同(轴移1为4.4 mm;95%置信区间[CI],2.7至6.1 mm [p = 0.99],轴移2为4.3 mm;95% CI,2.6至6.0 mm [p = 0.99]),14个膝关节中有10个转变为相应的3级轴移(外侧平移>20 mm)。ALL和ITB切断后内旋增加发生在25°、60°和90°(所有p = 0.99),范围为1°至12°,21%的膝关节增加8°至12°。
切断ACL后,即使ALL和ITB结构完整,也会出现阳性轴移前半脱位,这表明后者不是主要限制因素,而是作为前外侧次要限制因素共同发挥作用。在ACL缺失的情况下,ALL和ITB同时缺失导致大多数膝关节(71%)转变为3级轴移半脱位,同时部分膝关节内旋大幅增加。
ACL断裂时,天然的ALL或ITB结构无法充分抵抗旋转不稳定性的大幅增加。因此,解剖学ALL或ITB手术重建无法阻止阳性轴移。ACL移植物从这些结构卸载的潜在保护作用需要进一步研究。