Silvestre Daphné, Cavanagh Patrick, Arleo Angelo, Allard Rémy
Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris,
Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, Paris,
J Vis. 2017 Feb 1;17(2):5. doi: 10.1167/17.2.5.
External noise paradigms are widely used to characterize sensitivity by comparing the effect of a variable on contrast threshold when it is limited by internal versus external noise. A basic assumption of external noise paradigms is that the processing properties are the same in low and high noise. However, recent studies (e.g., Allard & Cavanagh, 2011; Allard & Faubert, 2014b) suggest that this assumption could be violated when using spatiotemporally localized noise (i.e., appearing simultaneously and at the same location as the target) but not when using spatiotemporally extended noise (i.e., continuously displayed, full-screen, dynamic noise). These previous findings may have been specific to the crowding and 0D noise paradigms that were used, so the purpose of the current study is to test if this violation of noise-invariant processing also occurs in a standard contrast detection task in white noise. The rationale of the current study is that local external noise triggers the use of recognition rather than detection and that a recognition process should be more affected by uncertainty about the shape of the target than one involving detection. To investigate the contribution of target knowledge on contrast detection, the effect of orientation uncertainty was evaluated for a contrast detection task in the absence of noise and in the presence of spatiotemporally localized or extended noise. A larger orientation uncertainty effect was observed with temporally localized noise than with temporally extended noise or with no external noise, indicating a change in the nature of the processing for temporally localized noise. We conclude that the use of temporally localized noise in external noise paradigms risks triggering a shift in process, invalidating the noise-invariant processing required for the paradigm. If, instead, temporally extended external noise is used to match the properties of internal noise, no such processing change occurs.
外部噪声范式被广泛用于通过比较变量在受内部噪声与外部噪声限制时对对比度阈值的影响来表征敏感度。外部噪声范式的一个基本假设是,在低噪声和高噪声情况下处理特性相同。然而,最近的研究(例如,阿拉德和卡瓦纳,2011年;阿拉德和福贝尔,2014年b)表明,当使用时空局部噪声(即与目标同时出现在同一位置)时,这一假设可能会被违反,但使用时空扩展噪声(即持续显示的全屏动态噪声)时则不会。这些先前的发现可能特定于所使用的拥挤和零维噪声范式,因此本研究的目的是测试在白噪声中的标准对比度检测任务中是否也会出现这种对噪声不变处理的违反情况。本研究的基本原理是,局部外部噪声会触发识别而非检测的使用,并且识别过程应该比涉及检测的过程更容易受到目标形状不确定性的影响。为了研究目标知识对对比度检测的贡献,在无噪声以及存在时空局部或扩展噪声的情况下,针对对比度检测任务评估了方向不确定性的影响。与时空扩展噪声或无外部噪声相比,在时空局部噪声情况下观察到更大的方向不确定性效应,这表明时空局部噪声的处理性质发生了变化。我们得出结论,在外部噪声范式中使用时空局部噪声有引发处理过程转变的风险,使该范式所需的噪声不变处理无效。相反,如果使用时空扩展外部噪声来匹配内部噪声的特性,则不会发生这种处理变化。