Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prentice Women's Hospital, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prentice Women's Hospital, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Apr;145(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
To determine the cost-effectiveness of dose-dense versus standard intravenous adjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer using results from the no-bevacizumab cohort of the Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 262 (GOG-262) randomized controlled trial, which reported a smaller absolute progression-free survival (PFS) benefit than the prior Japanese trial.
A three-state Markov decision model from a healthcare system perspective with a 21day cycle length and 28month time-horizon was used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) values per progression-free life-year saved (PFLYS) using results from GOG-262. Costs of chemotherapy, complications, and surveillance were from Medicare or institutional data. PFS, discontinuation, and complication rates were from GOG-262. Time-dependent transition probabilities and within-cycle corrections were used. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.
The model produces standard and dose-dense cohorts with 84.3% and 68.3% progression event proportions at 28months, matching GOG-262 rates at the trial's median follow-up. With a median PFS of 10.3months after standard chemotherapy and a hazard ratio for progression of 0.62 after dose-dense therapy, the ICER for dose-dense chemotherapy is $8074.25 (95% confidence interval: $7615.97-$10,207.16) per PFLYS. ICER estimates are sensitive only to the hazard ratio estimate but do not exceed $100,000 per PFLYS. 99.8% of ICER estimates met a more stringent willingness-to-pay of $50,000 per PFLYS. The willingness-to-pay value at which there is a 90% probability of dose-dense treatment being cost-effective is $12,000 per PFLYS.
Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy is robustly cost-effective for advanced ovarian cancer from a healthcare system perspective based on results from GOG-262.
利用妇科肿瘤学组方案 262(GOG-262)随机对照试验中无贝伐单抗队列的结果,确定密集剂量与标准静脉辅助化疗治疗卵巢癌的成本效益,该试验报告的无进展生存(PFS)获益小于先前的日本试验。
采用三状态马尔可夫决策模型,从医疗保健系统的角度出发,以 21 天的周期长度和 28 个月的时间范围,使用 GOG-262 的结果计算每节省一个无进展生存期(PFS)的增量成本效益比(ICER)值。化疗、并发症和监测的成本来自医疗保险或机构数据。PFS、停药和并发症发生率来自 GOG-262。使用时间依赖性转移概率和周期内校正。进行了单因素和概率敏感性分析。
该模型产生了标准和密集剂量组,在 28 个月时进展事件的比例分别为 84.3%和 68.3%,与 GOG-262 在试验中位随访时的比率相匹配。标准化疗后 PFS 的中位数为 10.3 个月,密集化疗后进展的风险比为 0.62,密集化疗的 ICER 为每 PFLYS 8074.25 美元(95%置信区间:7615.97-10207.16)。ICER 估计仅对风险比估计敏感,但不超过每 PFLYS 100000 美元。99.8%的 ICER 估计符合更严格的每 PFLYS 50000 美元的意愿支付水平。密集化疗在每 PFLYS 12000 美元的意愿支付值下有 90%的可能性具有成本效益。
从医疗保健系统的角度来看,基于 GOG-262 的结果,密集辅助化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌具有稳健的成本效益。