Suppr超能文献

使用全迭代重建技术的超低剂量CT进行肺癌筛查。

Lung cancer screening with ultra-low dose CT using full iterative reconstruction.

作者信息

Fujita Masayo, Higaki Toru, Awaya Yoshikazu, Nakanishi Toshio, Nakamura Yuko, Tatsugami Fuminari, Baba Yasutaka, Iida Makoto, Awai Kazuo

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.

Department of Internal Medicine, Miyoshi Central Hospital, 531 Sakaya-cho, Miyoshi, Hiroshima, 728-0023, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Radiol. 2017 Apr;35(4):179-189. doi: 10.1007/s11604-017-0618-y. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic capability of ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT) with full iterative reconstruction (f-IR) for lung cancer screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All underwent ULDCT and/or low-dose CT (LD-CT) on a 320-detector scanner. ULDCT images were reconstructed with f-IR. We qualitatively and quantitatively studied 95 nodules in 69 subjects. Two radiologists classified the nodules on ULDCT images as solid-, part-solid-, and pure ground-glass (PGG) and recorded their mean size. Their findings were compared with the reference standard. The observer performance study included 7 other radiologists and 35 subjects with- and 15 without nodules. The results were analyzed by AFROC analysis.

RESULTS

In the qualitative study, the kappa values between observers 1 and 2, respectively, and the reference standard were 0.70 and 0.83; the intra-class correlation coefficients for the nodule diameter between the reference standard and their measurements were 0.84 and 0.90. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the area under the curve (AUC) difference for nodule detection on LDCT and ULDCT was -0.03 to 0.07. The 95% CI crossed the 0 difference in the AUC but not the pre-defined non-inferiority margin of -0.08.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic ability of ULDCT using f-IR is comparable to LDCT.

摘要

目的

探讨采用全迭代重建(f-IR)的超低剂量CT(ULDCT)用于肺癌筛查的诊断能力。

材料与方法

所有受试者均在320排探测器扫描仪上接受ULDCT和/或低剂量CT(LD-CT)检查。ULDCT图像采用f-IR重建。我们对69名受试者中的95个结节进行了定性和定量研究。两名放射科医生将ULDCT图像上的结节分类为实性、部分实性和纯磨玻璃(PGG)结节,并记录其平均大小。将他们的结果与参考标准进行比较。观察者性能研究纳入了另外7名放射科医生以及35名有结节和15名无结节的受试者。结果通过AFROC分析进行分析。

结果

在定性研究中,观察者1和观察者2分别与参考标准之间的kappa值为0.70和0.83;参考标准与其测量的结节直径的组内相关系数分别为0.84和0.90。LDCT和ULDCT上结节检测的曲线下面积(AUC)差异的95%置信区间(CI)为-0.03至0.07。95%CI跨越了AUC的0差异,但未跨越预先定义的非劣效性界值-0.08。

结论

采用f-IR的ULDCT的诊断能力与LDCT相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验