Merlin Francesca, Riboli-Sasco Livio
IHPST - CNRS & Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, 13 rue du Four, 75006, Paris, France.
Atelier des Jours à Venir, 97 allée Théodore Monod, 64210, Bidart, France.
Acta Biotheor. 2017 Jun;65(2):97-115. doi: 10.1007/s10441-017-9305-8. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
The current debate over extending inheritance and its evolutionary impact has focused on adding new categories of non-genetic factors to the classical transmission of DNA, and on trying to redefine inheritance. Transmitted factors have been mainly characterized by their directions of transmission (vertical, horizontal, or both) and the way they store variations. In this paper, we leave aside the issue of defining inheritance. We rather try to build an evolutionary conceptual framework that allows for tracing most, if not all forms of transmission and makes sense of their different tempos and modes. We discuss three key distinctions that should in particular be the targets of theoretical and empirical investigation, and try to assess the interplay among them and evolutionary dynamics. We distinguish two channels of transmission (channel 1 and channel 2), two measurements of the temporal dynamics of transmission, respectively across and within generations (durability and residency), and two types of transmitted factors according to their evolutionary relevance (selectively relevant and neutral stable factors). By implementing these three distinctions we can then map different forms of transmission over a continuous space describing the combination of their varying dynamical features. While our aim is not to provide yet another model of inheritance, putting together these distinctions and crossing them, we manage to offer an inclusive conceptual framework of transmission, grounded in empirical observation, and coherent with evolutionary theory. This interestingly opens possibilities for qualitative and quantitative analyses, and is a necessary step, we argue, in order to question the interplay between the dynamics of evolution and the dynamics of multiple forms of transmission.
当前关于扩展遗传及其进化影响的争论主要集中在将新的非遗传因素类别添加到经典的DNA传递中,以及试图重新定义遗传。传递因素主要根据其传递方向(垂直、水平或两者兼有)以及储存变异的方式来表征。在本文中,我们暂不考虑遗传定义的问题。相反,我们试图构建一个进化概念框架,该框架能够追踪大多数(如果不是全部)形式的传递,并理解它们不同的节奏和模式。我们讨论了三个关键区别,它们尤其应该成为理论和实证研究的目标,并试图评估它们之间的相互作用以及进化动态。我们区分了两种传递渠道(渠道1和渠道2)、两种传递时间动态的测量方法,分别是跨代和代内的(耐久性和驻留性),以及根据其进化相关性划分的两种传递因素类型(选择相关因素和中性稳定因素)。通过实施这三个区别,我们可以在一个连续空间上描绘不同形式的传递,该空间描述了它们不同动态特征的组合。虽然我们的目的不是提供另一种遗传模型,但通过将这些区别组合并交叉起来,我们成功地提供了一个基于实证观察、与进化理论相一致的包容性传递概念框架。有趣的是,这为定性和定量分析开辟了可能性,并且我们认为,这是质疑进化动态与多种传递形式动态之间相互作用的必要步骤。