Doebeli Michael, Ispolatov Yaroslav, Simon Burt
Department of Zoology and Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Departamento de Fisica, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Elife. 2017 Feb 15;6:e23804. doi: 10.7554/eLife.23804.
Most evolutionary thinking is based on the notion of fitness and related ideas such as fitness landscapes and evolutionary optima. Nevertheless, it is often unclear what fitness actually is, and its meaning often depends on the context. Here we argue that fitness should not be a basal ingredient in verbal or mathematical descriptions of evolution. Instead, we propose that evolutionary birth-death processes, in which individuals give birth and die at ever-changing rates, should be the basis of evolutionary theory, because such processes capture the fundamental events that generate evolutionary dynamics. In evolutionary birth-death processes, fitness is at best a derived quantity, and owing to the potential complexity of such processes, there is no guarantee that there is a simple scalar, such as fitness, that would describe long-term evolutionary outcomes. We discuss how evolutionary birth-death processes can provide useful perspectives on a number of central issues in evolution.
大多数进化思想是基于适应度的概念以及诸如适应度景观和进化最优值等相关概念。然而,适应度实际上究竟是什么往往并不明确,其含义常常取决于上下文。在此我们认为,适应度不应是进化的文字或数学描述中的基本要素。相反,我们提出,个体以不断变化的速率出生和死亡的进化生死过程,应成为进化理论的基础,因为此类过程抓住了产生进化动态的基本事件。在进化生死过程中,适应度充其量只是一个派生量,并且由于此类过程可能具有的复杂性,无法保证存在一个简单的标量(如适应度)能够描述长期的进化结果。我们讨论了进化生死过程如何能为进化中的一些核心问题提供有用的视角。