• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知控制缺陷区分青少年自杀意念者与自杀未遂者。

Cognitive Control Deficits Differentiate Adolescent Suicide Ideators From Attempters.

作者信息

Stewart Jeremy G, Glenn Catherine R, Esposito Erika C, Cha Christine B, Nock Matthew K, Auerbach Randy P

机构信息

McLean Hospital, 115 Mill St, Mailstop 331, de Marneffe Building, Room 239, Belmont, MA 02478-9106.

Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;78(6):e614-e621. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16m10647.

DOI:10.4088/JCP.16m10647
PMID:28199073
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Mental illness and suicidal ideation are among the strongest correlates of suicidal behaviors, but few adolescents with these risk factors make a suicide attempt. Therefore, it is critical to identify factors associated with the transition from suicide ideation to attempts. The present study tested whether deficits in cognitive control in the context of suicide-relevant stimuli (ie, suicide interference) reliably differentiated adolescent ideators and attempters.

METHODS

Adolescents (n = 99; 71 girls) aged 13-18 years (mean = 15.53, SD = 1.34) with recent suicide ideation (n = 60) or a recent suicide attempt (n = 39) were recruited from an acute residential treatment facility between August 2012 and December 2013. We measured interference to suicide-related, negative, and positive words using the Suicide Stroop Task (SST).

RESULTS

When stimuli were analyzed separately, suicide attempters showed greater interference for suicide (t₉₇ = 2.04, P = .044, d = 0.41) and positive (t₉₇ = 2.63, P = .010, d = 0.53) stimuli compared to suicide ideators. An additional omnibus interference (suicide, negative, positive) x group (suicide ideator, suicide attempter) analysis of variance revealed a main effect of group (F₁,₉₇ = 4.31, P = .041, ηp² = 0.04) but no interaction (P = .166), indicating that attempters showed greater interference for emotional stimuli, regardless of valence. Multiple attempters drove this effect; single attempters and ideators did not differ in SST performance (P = .608).

CONCLUSIONS

General deficits in cognitive control in the context of emotional stimuli may be a marker of adolescent suicide risk.

摘要

目的

精神疾病和自杀意念是自杀行为最密切的相关因素,但很少有具有这些风险因素的青少年会尝试自杀。因此,识别与从自杀意念转变为自杀企图相关的因素至关重要。本研究测试了在与自杀相关的刺激(即自杀干扰)背景下认知控制缺陷是否能可靠地区分有自杀意念的青少年和自杀未遂者。

方法

2012年8月至2013年12月期间,从一家急性住院治疗机构招募了13 - 18岁(平均 = 15.53,标准差 = 1.34)的青少年(n = 99;71名女孩),他们近期有自杀意念(n = 60)或近期有过自杀未遂行为(n = 39)。我们使用自杀斯特鲁普任务(SST)测量对与自杀相关、消极和积极词汇的干扰。

结果

当分别分析刺激时,与有自杀意念者相比,自杀未遂者对自杀(t₉₇ = 2.04,P = .044,d = 0.41)和积极(t₉₇ = 2.63,P = .010,d = 0.53)刺激表现出更大的干扰。另外一项综合干扰(自杀、消极、积极)×组(有自杀意念者、自杀未遂者)方差分析显示有组的主效应(F₁,₉₇ = 4.31,P = .041,ηp² = 0.04)但无交互作用(P = .166),表明无论效价如何,自杀未遂者对情绪刺激表现出更大的干扰。多次自杀未遂者导致了这种效应;单次自杀未遂者和有自杀意念者在SST表现上没有差异(P = .608)。

结论

在情绪刺激背景下认知控制的普遍缺陷可能是青少年自杀风险的一个标志。

相似文献

1
Cognitive Control Deficits Differentiate Adolescent Suicide Ideators From Attempters.认知控制缺陷区分青少年自杀意念者与自杀未遂者。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;78(6):e614-e621. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16m10647.
2
Adolescent self-injurers: Comparing non-ideators, suicide ideators, and suicide attempters.青少年自我伤害者:非自杀意念者、有自杀意念者和自杀未遂者的比较。
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Jan;84:105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.09.031. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
3
Cognitive inhibition and attentional biases in the affective go/no-go performance of depressed, suicidal populations.抑郁、自杀人群在情感 Go/No-Go 表现中的认知抑制和注意偏差。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Sep 1;256:228-233. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.022. Epub 2019 May 13.
4
Identifying differences between depressed adolescent suicide ideators and attempters.识别抑郁青少年自杀意念者与自杀未遂者之间的差异。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Nov 1;186:127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.031. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
5
Neurophysiological Markers Related to Negative Self-referential Processing Differentiate Adolescent Suicide Ideators and Attempters.与消极自我参照加工相关的神经生理标志物可区分青少年自杀意念者和自杀未遂者。
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2021 Apr 20;1(1):16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.04.001. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Microanalysis of adolescent suicide attempters and ideators during the acute suicidal episode.急性自杀发作期间青少年自杀未遂者和有自杀意念者的微观分析。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Nov;36(11):1512-9. doi: 10.1016/S0890-8567(09)66559-X.
7
Course of cognitive impairment following attempted suicide in older adults.老年人自杀未遂后的认知障碍病程
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;31(6):592-600. doi: 10.1002/gps.4365. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
8
Suicide Attempters, Suicide Ideators, and Non-Ideators.自杀未遂者、有自杀意念者和无自杀意念者。
Crisis. 2019 Jul;40(4):294-297. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000554. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
9
Do suicide attempters and suicide ideators differ in capability for suicide?自杀未遂者和有自杀意念者在自杀能力上是否存在差异?
Psychiatry Res. 2019 May;275:304-309. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.03.038. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
10
Prevalence and characteristics of suicide attempters and ideators among acutely admitted psychiatric hospital patients in northwest Russia and northern Norway.俄罗斯西北部和挪威北部急性收治的精神病院患者中自杀未遂者和有自杀意念者的患病率及特征。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Aug 4;15:187. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0545-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the Construct Validity of Experimental Suicide Images Among Young Adults.检验实验性自杀图像在年轻人中的结构效度。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2025 Apr;55(2):e70010. doi: 10.1111/sltb.70010.
2
Negative Urgency and Lack of Perseverance Predict Suicidal Ideation and Attempts Among Young Adolescents.消极冲动性和缺乏毅力预示着青少年的自杀意念和自杀企图。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2024 Nov 21:1-11. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2024.2426128.
3
Multi-modal risk factors differentiate suicide attempters from ideators in military veterans with major depressive disorder.
多模态风险因素将有重大抑郁障碍的退伍军人中的自杀企图者与有自杀意念者区分开来。
J Affect Disord. 2025 Jan 15;369:588-598. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.149. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
4
A suicide attentional bias as implicit cognitive marker of suicide vulnerability in a high-risk sample.自杀注意偏向作为高危样本中自杀易感性的内隐认知标志。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 7;15:1406675. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1406675. eCollection 2024.
5
Psychometric properties of the modified Suicide Stroop Task (M-SST) in patients with suicide risk and healthy controls.自杀风险患者和健康对照者中改良自杀斯特鲁普任务(M-SST)的心理测量学特性。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 14;15:1332316. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1332316. eCollection 2024.
6
Attention-Dominated Cognitive Dysfunction May Be a Biological Marker for Distinguishing SA from SI in Adolescents: A Network Analysis Study Based on Adolescent Depression.注意力主导的认知功能障碍可能是区分青少年社交焦虑障碍与社交抑制的生物学标志物:一项基于青少年抑郁症的网络分析研究
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Mar 6;17:945-956. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S448904. eCollection 2024.
7
Stress exposure in at-risk, depressed, and suicidal adolescents.高危、抑郁和有自杀倾向青少年的应激暴露。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2024 Jul;65(7):942-958. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13935. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
8
Reactive control in suicide ideators and attempters: An examination of the congruency sequence effect in cognitive and emotional Simon tasks.自杀意念者和尝试者的反应控制:认知和情绪 Simon 任务中的一致性序列效应检验。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0295041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295041. eCollection 2023.
9
Toward objective characterizations of suicide risk: A narrative review of laboratory-based cognitive and behavioral tasks.向着自杀风险的客观特征描述迈进:基于实验室的认知和行为任务的叙述性综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Oct;153:105361. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105361. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
10
Associations of bullying perpetration and peer victimization subtypes with preadolescent's suicidality, non-suicidal self-injury, neurocognition, and brain development.欺负行为和同伴受害亚型与青春期前自杀意念、非自杀性自伤、神经认知和大脑发育的关联。
BMC Med. 2023 Apr 12;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02808-8.