Suppr超能文献

在识别患有脆性骨折的血液透析患者方面,皮质骨孔隙率并不优于传统骨密度测定法。

Cortical porosity not superior to conventional densitometry in identifying hemodialysis patients with fragility fracture.

作者信息

Bielesz Bernhard, Patsch Janina M, Fischer Lukas, Bojic Marija, Winnicki Wolfgang, Weber Michael, Cejka Daniel

机构信息

Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Division of General Radiology and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Feb 15;12(2):e0171873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171873. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Hemodialysis (HD) patients face increased fracture risk, which is further associated with elevated risk of hospitalization and mortality. High-resolution peripheral computed tomography (HR-pQCT) has advanced our understanding of bone disease in chronic kidney disease by characterizing distinct changes in both the cortical and trabecular compartments. Increased cortical porosity (Ct.Po) has been shown to be associated with fracture in patients with osteopenia or in postmenopausal diabetic women. We tested whether the degree of Ct.Po identifies hemodialysis patients with prevalent fragility fractures in comparison to bone mineral density (BMD) assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We performed a post-hoc analysis of a cross-sectional study in 76 prevalent hemodialysis patients. Markers of mineral metabolism, coronary calcification score, DXA-, and HR-pQCT-data were analyzed, and Ct.Po determined at radius and tibia. Ct.Po was significantly higher in patients with fracture but association was lost after adjusting for age and gender (tibia p = 0.228, radius p = 0.5). Instead, femoral (F) BMD neck area (p = 0.03), F T-score neck area (p = 0.03), radius (R) BMD (p = 0.03), R T-score (p = 0.03), and cortical HR-pQCT indices such as cortical area (Ct.Ar) (tibia: p = 0.01; radius: p = 0.02) and cortical thickness (Ct.Th) (tibia: p = 0.03; radius: p = 0.02) correctly classified patients with fragility fractures. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) for Ct.Po (tibia AUC: 0.711; p = 0.01; radius AUC: 0.666; p = 0.04), Ct.Ar (tibia AUC: 0.832; p<0.001; radius AUC: 0.796; p<0.001), and F neck BMD (AUC: 0.758; p = 0.002) did not differ significantly among each other. In conclusion, measuring Ct.Po is not superior to BMD determined by DXA for identification of HD patients with fragility fracture.

摘要

血液透析(HD)患者面临的骨折风险增加,这进一步与住院和死亡风险升高相关。高分辨率外周计算机断层扫描(HR-pQCT)通过描述皮质和小梁区域的不同变化,加深了我们对慢性肾病骨病的理解。皮质孔隙率(Ct.Po)增加已被证明与骨质减少患者或绝经后糖尿病女性的骨折有关。我们测试了与双能X线吸收法(DXA)评估的骨矿物质密度(BMD)相比,Ct.Po程度是否能识别患有普遍性脆性骨折的血液透析患者。我们对76例普遍性血液透析患者的横断面研究进行了事后分析。分析了矿物质代谢标志物、冠状动脉钙化评分、DXA和HR-pQCT数据,并测定了桡骨和胫骨的Ct.Po。骨折患者的Ct.Po显著更高,但在调整年龄和性别后相关性消失(胫骨p = 0.228,桡骨p = 0.5)。相反,股骨(F)颈骨密度(p = 0.03)、F颈T值(p = 0.03)、桡骨(R)骨密度(p = 0.03)、R T值(p = 0.03)以及皮质HR-pQCT指数,如皮质面积(Ct.Ar)(胫骨:p = 0.01;桡骨:p = 0.02)和皮质厚度(Ct.Th)(胫骨:p = 0.03;桡骨:p = 0.02)能够正确分类脆性骨折患者。Ct.Po(胫骨AUC:0.711;p = 0.01;桡骨AUC:0.666;p = 0.04)、Ct.Ar(胫骨AUC:0.832;p<0.001;桡骨AUC:0.796;p<0.001)和F颈骨密度(AUC:0.758;p = 0.002)的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)彼此之间无显著差异。总之,在识别患有脆性骨折的血液透析患者方面,测量Ct.Po并不优于DXA测定的BMD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验