Puigvehí Marc, Broquetas Teresa, Coll Susanna, Garcia-Retortillo Montserrat, Cañete Nuria, Fernández Rosa, Gimeno Javier, Sanchez Juan, Bory Felipe, Pedro-Botet Juan, Solà Ricard, Carrión José A
Liver Section, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct;32(10):1746-1753. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13762.
Transient elastography is the reference method for liver stiffness measurement (LSM) in the general population, having lower applicability in obese patients. We evaluated the applicability and diagnostic accuracy of the M and XL probes in overweight/obese patients to establish the most appropriate approach.
From May 2013 to March 2015, we evaluated patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 28 kg/m . We constructed an algorithm with variables independently related to unreliable LSM with the M probe.
A total of 1084 patients were evaluated. M and XL probe applicability was 88.8% and 98%, respectively. Waist circumference (WC) (OR; 95% CI; P) (0.97; 0.94-0.99; P < 0.001) and skin-capsule distance (SCD) (0.83; 0.79-0.87; P < 0.001) were independently related to unreliable LSM (M probe). The SCD was > 25 mm in 5.5% of individuals with a BMI ≤ 35 kg/m and a WC ≤ 117 cm, with LSM (M probe) applicability rising to 94.3%. In contrast, 36.9% of patients with a BMI > 35 kg/m and/or a WC > 117 cm presented an SCD > 25 mm, with M probe applicability being 73.1%. The diagnostic accuracy (area under the receiver operator characteristic) using the M probe to identify significant steatosis (0.76), fibrosis (0.89), and cirrhosis (0.96) was very high in patients with a BMI ≤ 35 kg/m and a WC ≤ 117 cm.
The applicability and accuracy of the FibroScan M probe to identify fibrosis and steatosis was excellent in overweight and obesity grade I (BMI ≤ 35 kg/m ) with a WC ≤ 117 cm. The XL probe increased the applicability of transient elastography in obesity grade II-III (BMI > 35 kg/m ).
瞬时弹性成像技术是普通人群中测量肝脏硬度(LSM)的参考方法,但在肥胖患者中的适用性较低。我们评估了M型和XL型探头在超重/肥胖患者中的适用性和诊断准确性,以确定最合适的方法。
2013年5月至2015年3月,我们对体重指数(BMI)≥28kg/m²的患者进行了评估。我们构建了一种算法,该算法包含与使用M型探头进行不可靠LSM独立相关的变量。
共评估了1084例患者。M型和XL型探头的适用性分别为88.8%和98%。腰围(WC)(比值比;95%可信区间;P值)(0.97;0.94 - 0.99;P < 0.001)和皮肤-包膜距离(SCD)(0.83;0.79 - 0.87;P < 0.001)与不可靠的LSM(M型探头)独立相关。在BMI≤35kg/m²且WC≤117cm的个体中,5.5%的人SCD>25mm,此时LSM(M型探头)的适用性升至94.3%。相比之下,BMI>35kg/m²和/或WC>117cm的患者中,36.9%的人SCD>25mm,M型探头的适用性为73.1%。在BMI≤35kg/m²且WC≤117cm的患者中,使用M型探头识别显著脂肪变性(曲线下面积为0.76)、纤维化(0.89)和肝硬化(0.96)的诊断准确性非常高。
FibroScan M型探头在超重及I级肥胖(BMI≤35kg/m²)且WC≤117cm的患者中识别纤维化和脂肪变性的适用性和准确性极佳。XL型探头提高了瞬时弹性成像技术在II - III级肥胖(BMI>35kg/m²)中的适用性。