Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Medical School of National &, Laiko General Hospital, Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
First Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School of National &, Laiko General Hospital, Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
J Digit Imaging. 2021 Dec;34(6):1342-1348. doi: 10.1007/s10278-021-00521-7. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility and correlation of liver stiffness measurements (LSM) between 2D-shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) and transient elastography (TE) in patients with chronic liver disease. Over 4 months, 421 patients with chronic liver disease of any cause underwent LSM by 2D-SWE and TE (M and/or XL probe) and controlled attenuation parameter at the same visit. LSM was not feasible by TE in 16 (3.8%) and by 2D-SWE in 17 (4.0%) patients. Median LSM were 8.9 and 8.7 kPa with TE and 2D-SWE, respectively, having a strong correlation (r = 0.774, p < 0.001) in the total cohort and in any cause of liver disease (r = 0.747-0.806, p < 0.001). There was a strong agreement on diagnosis of severe fibrosis (k-statistic: 0.841, p < 0.001) or cirrhosis (k-statistic: 0.823, p < 0.001). Both methods had increased failure rates in patients with obesity and/or increased waist circumference. Among 104 obese patients, TE was more feasible than 2D-SWE (92.3% vs 85.6%, p < 0.001]. LSM by 2D-SWE are strongly correlated to LSM by TE independently of the etiology of chronic liver disease, stage of fibrosis, degree of liver steatosis, and patients' characteristics. TE with the XL probe may be superior in a minority of obese patients.
本研究旨在探讨二维剪切波弹性成像(2D-SWE)与瞬时弹性成像(TE)测量慢性肝病患者肝脏硬度的可行性和相关性。在 4 个月的时间里,421 例不同病因的慢性肝病患者在同一次就诊时接受了 2D-SWE 和 TE(M 和/或 XL 探头)及受控衰减参数的 LSM 检查。TE 检查有 16 例(3.8%)和 2D-SWE 检查有 17 例(4.0%)无法进行 LSM。TE 和 2D-SWE 检测的 LSM 中位数分别为 8.9kPa 和 8.7kPa,两者在总队列中和任何病因的肝病中均具有很强的相关性(r=0.774,p<0.001)(r=0.747-0.806,p<0.001)。两种方法在诊断严重纤维化(K 统计量:0.841,p<0.001)或肝硬化(K 统计量:0.823,p<0.001)方面具有高度一致性。两种方法在肥胖和/或腰围增加的患者中失败率均增加。在 104 例肥胖患者中,TE 比 2D-SWE 更可行(92.3%比 85.6%,p<0.001)。2D-SWE 的 LSM 与 TE 的 LSM 具有很强的相关性,与慢性肝病的病因、纤维化分期、肝脂肪变性程度和患者特征无关。在少数肥胖患者中,XL 探头的 TE 可能更具优势。