Spapen Herbert D, De Regt Jouke, Honoré Patrick M
Department of Intensive Care, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jan;9(1):E44-E49. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.01.32.
A beneficial adjuvant role of chest physiotherapy (CPT) to promote airway clearance, alveolar recruitment, and ventilation/perfusion matching in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients with pneumonia or relapsing lung atelectasis is commonly accepted. However, doubt prevails regarding the usefulness of applying routine CPT in MV subjects with no such lung diseases. In-depth narrative review based on a literature search for prospective randomized trials comparing CPT with a non-CPT strategy in adult patients ventilated for at least 48 h. Six relevant studies were identified. Sample size was small. Various CPT modalities were used including body positioning, manual chest manipulation (mobilization, percussion, vibration, and compression), and specific techniques such as lung hyperinflation and intrapulmonary percussion. Control subjects mostly received general nursing care and tracheal suction. In general, CPT was safe and supportive, yet had debatable or no significant impact on any relevant patient outcome parameter, including pneumonia. Current evidence does not support "prophylactic" CPT in adult MV patients without pneumonia.
胸部物理治疗(CPT)对促进机械通气(MV)的肺炎患者或复发性肺不张患者的气道清除、肺泡复张及通气/血流匹配具有有益的辅助作用,这一点已得到普遍认可。然而,对于在没有此类肺部疾病的MV患者中应用常规CPT的有效性仍存在疑问。基于文献检索进行深入的叙述性综述,以比较CPT与非CPT策略在通气至少48小时的成年患者中的前瞻性随机试验。共识别出六项相关研究。样本量较小。使用了各种CPT方式,包括体位摆放、手动胸部操作(松动、叩击、振动和按压)以及诸如肺过度充气和肺内叩击等特定技术。对照组大多接受常规护理和气管吸引。总体而言,CPT是安全且有辅助作用的,但对包括肺炎在内的任何相关患者结局参数的影响存在争议或无显著影响。目前的证据不支持在无肺炎的成年MV患者中进行“预防性”CPT。