Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave, Box 359931, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Department of Medicine, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2017 Nov;21(11):3111-3121. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1718-5.
We compared same-day provider medical record documentation and interventions addressing depression and risk behaviors before and after delivering point-of-care patient-reported outcomes (PROs) feedback for patients who self-reported clinically relevant levels of depression or risk behaviors. During the study period (1 January 2006-15 October 2010), 2289 PRO assessments were completed by HIV-infected patients. Comparing the 8 months before versus after feedback implementation, providers were more likely to document depression (74% before vs. 87% after feedback, p = 0.02) in patients with moderate-to-severe depression (n = 317 assessments), at-risk alcohol use (41 vs. 64%, p = 0.04, n = 155) and substance use (60 vs. 80%, p = 0.004, n = 212). Providers were less likely to incorrectly document good adherence among patients with inadequate adherence after feedback (42 vs. 24%, p = 0.02, n = 205). While PRO feedback of depression and adherence were followed by increased provider intervention, other domains were not. Further investigation of factors associated with the gap between awareness and intervention are needed in order to bridge this divide.
我们比较了在为自我报告临床相关抑郁或风险行为水平的患者提供即时护理患者报告结局 (PRO) 反馈前后,记录医生针对抑郁和风险行为的医疗记录和干预措施。在研究期间(2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 10 月 15 日),2289 名 HIV 感染患者完成了 PRO 评估。与反馈实施前的 8 个月相比,反馈后医生更有可能记录中度至重度抑郁患者(n=317 次评估)的抑郁情况(74% 对比 87%,p=0.02)、有风险的酒精使用(41% 对比 64%,p=0.04,n=155)和药物使用(60% 对比 80%,p=0.004,n=212)。反馈后,医生不太可能错误地记录治疗不依从患者的依从性良好(42% 对比 24%,p=0.02,n=205)。尽管 PRO 反馈抑郁和依从性增加了医生的干预,但其他领域并没有。需要进一步调查与意识和干预之间差距相关的因素,以便弥合这一差距。