Antela Antonio, Bernardino José Ignacio, de Quirós Juan Carlos López-Bernaldo, Bachiller Pablo, Fuster-RuizdeApodaca María José, Puig Jordi, Rodríguez Silvia, Castrejón Isabel, Álvarez Beatriz, Hermenegildo Marta
Infectious Diseases Unit, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (CHUS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
HIV Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Oct;11(5):2017-2033. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00678-w. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
The aim of this study was to reach consensus on the use of PROs (patient-reported outcome measures) in people living with HIV (PLHIV).
A scientific committee of professionals with experience in PROMs methodology issued recommendations and defined the points to support by evidence. A systematic review of the literature identified the coverage, utility, and psychometric properties of PROMs used in PLHIV. A Delphi survey was launched to measure the degree of agreement with the recommendations of a group of practicing clinicians and a group of patient representatives.
Four principles and ten recommendations were issued; however, the results of the Delphi showed significant differences in the opinion between health professionals and PLHIV, and polarization within collectives, hampering consensus.
Despite a wealth of evidence on the benefit of PROMs, there are clear barriers to their use by healthcare professionals in HIV care. Intervention on these barriers is paramount to allow truly patient-centered care.
本研究的目的是就艾滋病毒感染者(PLHIV)使用患者报告结局指标(PROs)达成共识。
一个在PROMs方法学方面有经验的专业科学委员会发布了建议,并确定了需要证据支持的要点。对文献进行系统回顾,以确定PLHIV中使用的PROMs的覆盖范围、效用和心理测量特性。开展了一项德尔菲调查,以衡量一组执业临床医生和一组患者代表对这些建议的认同程度。
发布了四项原则和十条建议;然而,德尔菲调查结果显示,卫生专业人员和PLHIV之间的意见存在显著差异,且群体内部存在两极分化,阻碍了共识的达成。
尽管有大量证据表明PROMs有益,但医疗保健专业人员在艾滋病毒护理中使用它们仍存在明显障碍。对这些障碍进行干预对于实现真正以患者为中心的护理至关重要。