• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

兽医从业者情感和认知共情的变化

Changes in Affective and Cognitive Empathy among Veterinary Practitioners.

作者信息

Schoenfeld-Tacher Regina M, Shaw Jane R, Meyer-Parsons Beatrice, Kogan Lori R

出版信息

J Vet Med Educ. 2017 Spring;44(1):63-71. doi: 10.3138/jvme.0116-009R2.

DOI:10.3138/jvme.0116-009R2
PMID:28206845
Abstract

Clinical empathy is a multi-dimensional concept characterized by four dimensions: (1) affective-the ability to experience patients' or clients' emotions and perspectives, (2) moral-the internal motivation to empathize, (3) cognitive-the intellectual ability to identify and comprehend others' perspective and emotions, and (4) behavioral-the ability to convey understanding of those emotions and perspectives back to the patient or client. The Davis Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) was used to examine the affective and cognitive facets of empathy in veterinary practitioners. The IRI consists of four subscales that measure cognitive (perspective taking and fantasy) and affective (emphatic concern and personal distress) components of empathy. Data from a cross-sectional sample of practicing veterinarians (n=434) were collected. Veterinarians' fantasy scores were lowest for those with the most clinical experience. Personal distress scores were highest among new veterinarians and lowest for those with 26 or more years in practice. High levels of personal distress in the early years of practice are concerning for the professional wellness of veterinarians. To combat this trend, the implementation of resilience-building interventions should be considered to support veterinary practitioners.

摘要

临床同理心是一个多维度的概念,其具有四个维度:(1)情感维度——体验患者或客户情绪及观点的能力;(2)道德维度——产生同理心的内在动机;(3)认知维度——识别和理解他人观点及情绪的智力能力;(4)行为维度——将对那些情绪和观点的理解传达给患者或客户的能力。戴维斯人际反应指数(IRI)被用于检验兽医从业者同理心的情感和认知方面。IRI由四个分量表组成,这些分量表测量同理心的认知(观点采择和幻想)和情感(共情关注和个人痛苦)成分。收集了来自执业兽医横断面样本(n = 434)的数据。临床经验最丰富的兽医,其幻想得分最低。新兽医的个人痛苦得分最高,而执业26年或更长时间的兽医,其个人痛苦得分最低。执业初期高水平的个人痛苦对兽医的职业健康而言令人担忧。为应对这一趋势,应考虑实施增强复原力的干预措施,以支持兽医从业者。

相似文献

1
Changes in Affective and Cognitive Empathy among Veterinary Practitioners.兽医从业者情感和认知共情的变化
J Vet Med Educ. 2017 Spring;44(1):63-71. doi: 10.3138/jvme.0116-009R2.
2
Educational Research Report: Changes in Students' Levels of Empathy during the Didactic Portion of a Veterinary Program.教育研究报告:兽医课程教学阶段学生同理心水平的变化
J Vet Med Educ. 2015 Fall;42(3):194-205. doi: 10.3138/jvme.0115-007R. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
3
Feeling for the Other With Ease: Prospective Actors Show High Levels of Emotion Recognition and Report Above Average Empathic Concern, but Do Not Experience Strong Distress.轻松感受他人:准演员表现出高水平的情绪识别能力,且报告的共情关注高于平均水平,但不会体验到强烈的痛苦。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 1;12:543846. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.543846. eCollection 2021.
4
Assessing Cognitive and Affective Empathy Through the Interpersonal Reactivity Index: An Argument Against a Two-Factor Model.通过人际反应指数评估认知共情和情感共情:对双因素模型的质疑
Assessment. 2016 Dec;23(6):769-777. doi: 10.1177/1073191115599055. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
5
If it makes you feel bad, don't do it! Egoistic rather than altruistic empathy modulates neural and behavioral responses in moral dilemmas.如果这让你感觉不好,那就别做!在道德困境中,利己而非利他的同理心会调节神经和行为反应。
Physiol Behav. 2014 May 10;130:127-34. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
6
Affective, sensory and empathic sharing of another's pain: The Empathy for Pain Scale.对他人疼痛的情感、感觉和共情分享:疼痛共情量表。
Eur J Pain. 2015 Jul;19(6):807-16. doi: 10.1002/ejp.607. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
7
Two facets of affective empathy: concern and distress have opposite relationships to emotion recognition.情感同理心的两个方面:关注和痛苦与情绪识别呈相反关系。
Cogn Emot. 2020 Sep;34(6):1112-1122. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1724893. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
8
Companion animal veterinarians' use of clinical communication skills.伴侣动物兽医临床沟通技巧的运用。
Aust Vet J. 2013 Sep;91(9):374-80. doi: 10.1111/avj.12083.
9
Dimensional structure and measurement invariance of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) across gender.跨性别视角下人际反应指标(IRI)的维度结构和测量不变性。
Psicothema. 2017 Nov;29(4):590-595. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2017.19.
10
Age-related differences in affective and cognitive empathy: self-report and performance-based evidence.情感共情和认知共情的年龄相关差异:自我报告及基于表现的证据
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2018 Sep;25(5):655-672. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2017.1360835. Epub 2017 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Benchmarking animal handling outcomes on cow-calf operations and identifying associated factors.评估肉牛繁殖场的动物处理结果并确定相关因素。
Transl Anim Sci. 2022 Aug 1;6(3):txac106. doi: 10.1093/tas/txac106. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Empathy and COVID-19: Study in Professionals and Students of the Social Health Field in Ecuador.同理心与 COVID-19:厄瓜多尔社会卫生领域专业人员和学生的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 5;18(1):338. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010338.
3
Exploring the Neural Correlates in Adopting a Realistic View: A Neural Structural and Functional Connectivity Study With Female Nurses.
探索形成现实观的神经关联:一项针对女护士的神经结构与功能连接性研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jun 11;13:197. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00197. eCollection 2019.