Cheng Ji-Wei, Li Yin, Xing Wen-Qun, Lv Hong-Wei, Wang Hao-Ran
Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital Zhengzhou, Henan, PR China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(7):e5525. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005525.
Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder, of unknown cause, which results in increased lower esophageal sphincter tone and symptoms of difficulty swallowing. Current major therapeutic options include laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and pneumatic dilation (PD). We undertake a systematic review comparing the efficacy and safety of these 2 treatments in the treatment of esophageal achalasia.
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized controlled trial investigating LHM versus PD in the treatment of primary achalasia. The primary outcome was symptom remission rates. The Mantel-Haenszel method with fixed-effect or random-effects model was used to calculate relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Five studies involving 498 participants were included. The cumulative remission rate was significantly higher with LHM at 3 months and 1 year (short-term), with a risk ratio of 1.16 (95% CI 1.01-1.35, P = 0.04) and 1.14 (95% CI 1.02-1.27, P = 0.02), respectively. There were no significant differences between LHM and PD in 2-year and 5-year remission rate (long-term), with a risk ratio of 1.05 (95% CI 0.91-1.22, P = 0.49) and 1.17 (95% CI 0.84-1.64, P = 0.34), respectively. Rates of major mucosal tears requiring subsequent intervention with LHM were significantly lower than those of esophageal perforation with PD requiring postprocedural medical or surgical therapy, with a risk ratio of 0.25 (95% CI 0.08-0.81, P = 0.02). Postprocedural rates of gastroesophageal reflux, lower esophageal sphincter pressures, and quality of life scores did not differ in trials with sufficient data.
There were no significant differences between LHM and PD in 2-year and 5-year remission rate. This study indicates that either treatment can be proposed as initial treatment for achalasia.
贲门失弛缓症是一种病因不明的食管动力障碍性疾病,可导致食管下括约肌张力增加和吞咽困难症状。目前主要的治疗选择包括腹腔镜Heller肌切开术(LHM)和气囊扩张术(PD)。我们进行了一项系统评价,比较这两种治疗方法在治疗食管贲门失弛缓症中的疗效和安全性。
检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库,查找关于LHM与PD治疗原发性贲门失弛缓症的随机对照试验。主要结局是症状缓解率。采用固定效应或随机效应模型的Mantel-Haenszel方法计算相对风险和95%置信区间(CI)。
纳入5项研究,共498名参与者。LHM在3个月和1年(短期)时的累积缓解率显著更高,风险比分别为1.16(95%CI 1.01-1.35,P = 0.04)和1.14(95%CI 1.02-1.27,P = 0.02)。LHM与PD在2年和5年缓解率(长期)方面无显著差异,风险比分别为1.05(95%CI 0.91-1.22,P = 0.49)和1.17(95%CI 0.84-1.64,P = 0.34)。LHM需要后续干预的严重黏膜撕裂发生率显著低于PD导致的需要术后药物或手术治疗的食管穿孔发生率,风险比为0.25(95%CI 0.08-0.81,P = 0.02)。在有足够数据的试验中,术后胃食管反流率、食管下括约肌压力和生活质量评分无差异。
LHM与PD在2年和5年缓解率方面无显著差异。本研究表明,这两种治疗方法均可作为贲门失弛缓症的初始治疗方法。