Suppr超能文献

他们是否遵守?医生关于腰痛治疗指南依从性的知识、态度及改变意愿。

Are They Complying? Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Readiness to Change Regarding Low Back Pain Treatment Guideline Adherence.

作者信息

Epstein-Sher Sheera, Jaffe Dena H, Lahad Amnon

机构信息

Braun School of Public Health, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

Health Outcomes Practice, Kantar Health, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Feb 15;42(4):247-252. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001714.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey of 145 primary care practitioners (PCPs).

OBJECTIVE

To examine low back pain (LBP) guideline knowledge, readiness to implement (RTI) these guidelines, and LBP attitudes and beliefs among Israeli PCPs and determine whether physician age, guideline familiarity, and medical specialty affect these variables.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

LBP is a common condition managed primarily by PCPs. Little is known, however, about physician's LBP knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs and how these factors (knowledge, A&B) influence their practice behavior. Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of PCPs have been shown to influence the course of their patients' LBP, and guidelines were devised in an attempt to improve the effectiveness and quality of LBP care. Research worldwide and in Israel has shown that LBP guideline implementation is not yet optimal.

METHODS

Participants completed a questionnaire. Variables were measured using a translated, validated version of the Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale; demographic and professional characteristics were analyzed for correlation with the outcome variables.

RESULTS

The likelihood of PCPs having nonguideline-consistent attitudes and beliefs (A&B) was greater among those older than 50 years (P < 0.05). Family medicine specialists (family practitioners [FPs]) were more likely to have a high level of guideline knowledge as compared to nonfamily medicine specialists (general practitioners (83.8 vs. 61.9, respectively; P < 0.001). Differences between FPs and general practitioners were also observed for the mean Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale score (34.6 vs. 41.1, respectively, P = 0.00), indicating a higher consistency of attitudes and beliefs with guidelines among FPs. No significant association was found between PCPs' knowledge level and RTI the guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that PCPs, especially FPs, had high levels of LBP guideline knowledge, although RTI was limited. The need for greater exposure to and understanding of the importance of implementation of LBP guidelines is essential for future guideline adherence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

研究设计

对145名初级保健医生(PCP)进行横断面调查。

目的

研究以色列初级保健医生对腰痛(LBP)指南的知识掌握情况、实施这些指南的意愿(RTI)以及对LBP的态度和信念,并确定医生年龄、对指南的熟悉程度和医学专业是否会影响这些变量。

背景数据总结

LBP是一种主要由初级保健医生管理的常见病症。然而,对于医生的LBP知识、态度和信念以及这些因素(知识、态度和信念)如何影响他们的执业行为,人们知之甚少。初级保健医生的知识、态度和信念已被证明会影响其患者LBP的病程,并且已经制定了指南以试图提高LBP护理的有效性和质量。全球和以色列的研究表明,LBP指南的实施尚未达到最佳状态。

方法

参与者完成一份问卷。使用经过翻译和验证的医疗服务提供者疼痛与损伤关系量表来测量变量;分析人口统计学和专业特征与结果变量之间的相关性。

结果

50岁以上的初级保健医生持有与指南不一致的态度和信念(A&B)的可能性更大(P<0.05)。与非家庭医学专科医生(全科医生)相比,家庭医学专科医生(家庭医生[FP])更有可能具有较高水平的指南知识(分别为83.8%和61.9%;P<0.001)。在医疗服务提供者疼痛与损伤关系量表的平均得分方面,家庭医生和全科医生之间也存在差异(分别为34.6和41.1,P = 0.00),这表明家庭医生的态度和信念与指南的一致性更高。初级保健医生的知识水平与实施指南的意愿之间未发现显著关联。

结论

本研究表明,初级保健医生,尤其是家庭医生,对LBP指南的知识掌握水平较高,尽管实施意愿有限。未来要更好地遵循指南,必须更多地接触并理解实施LBP指南的重要性。

证据水平

3级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验