Lin Shih-Chao, Kappes Matthew A, Chen Mei-Chun, Lin Chi-Chen, Wang Tony T
Program in Medical Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Center for Infectious Diseases, SRI International, Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 16;12(2):e0172299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172299. eCollection 2017.
Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells are widely utilized as a substrate for influenza virus isolation and propagation due to the high yields of virus. Here we compared the conventional MDCK cell line, MDCK-SIAT1 and MDCK-London for viral production, cell survival, and suitability in testing antivirals using six influenza strains including two H1N1 (pandemic and epidemic strains), three H3N2 and one influenza B strain. Overall our results suggest that MDCK-London cell line is superior for virus culturing and quantification, and hence an ideal platform to evaluate antiviral drug efficacy against multiple strains of influenza. Our data also suggests that while virus titers determined by the hemagglutination assay (HA) and neuraminidase activity (NA) are widely used to indicate viral load, there is a poor correlation between these measurements and the infectious titer obtained by plaque assay.
由于能产生高产量的病毒,麦迪逊-达比犬肾(MDCK)细胞被广泛用作流感病毒分离和繁殖的底物。在此,我们比较了传统的MDCK细胞系、MDCK-SIAT1和MDCK-London在病毒产生、细胞存活以及使用六种流感毒株(包括两种H1N1毒株(大流行株和流行株)、三种H3N2毒株和一种乙型流感毒株)测试抗病毒药物方面的适用性。总体而言,我们的结果表明,MDCK-London细胞系在病毒培养和定量方面更具优势,因此是评估针对多种流感毒株的抗病毒药物疗效的理想平台。我们的数据还表明,虽然血凝试验(HA)和神经氨酸酶活性(NA)测定的病毒滴度被广泛用于指示病毒载量,但这些测量值与通过空斑试验获得的感染滴度之间的相关性较差。