Shameem Mohammad, Mir Mohammad Amin
Professor, Department of Tuberculosis and Chest Disease, JN Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University , Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India .
Senior Resident, Department of Surgery, Firoz Hospital and Research Centre , Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Dec;10(12):LC23-LC27. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20904.9014. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
Nosocomial infections have been considered as a major health problem causing incremental morbidity, mortality and costs of therapy.
This retrospective study was initiated with aim to analyse the comparative efficacy of a novel Antibiotic Adjuvant Entity (AAE), a combination of ceftriaxone + sulbactam + disodium edetate and meropenem in combination with colistin, for the management of Multi Drug Resistant (MDR) nosocomial Gram-negative bacterial infections.
Case history sheets of patients with documented MDR nosocomial Gram-negative infections who received either AAE or meropenem in combination with colistin for management of infections over a period of 3 years (November 2012 - October 2015) were included in the study. Data related to clinical management, demographics, vital signs and laboratory parameters along with prior antibiotic therapy, dose and clinical outcomes were evaluated thoroughly to analyse the clinical benefits of this new AAE+ colistin therapy for management of MDR nosocomial infections.
Out of 115 patients short listed for the study, 52 patients had received AAE + colistin therapy and 63 patients have received meropenem + colistin. AAE + colistin therapy resulted in significantly higher efficacy (86.53%) as compared to meropenem + colistin (63.49%). A rising trend in clinical cure rates was observed in AAE based combination therapy in contrast to the decreasing trend in meropenem based combination therapy. A progressive decline in clinical cure rates was observed in meropenem treated group over a period of 3 years due to rising carbapenemases and multiple resistance by pathogens, where as AAE maintained the same efficacy.
The AAE + colistin therapy has shown better bacteriological and clinical efficacy as compared to meropenem + colistin in the management of various nosocomial MDR Gram-negative infections. A significant number of meropenem failure patients responded to the AAE therapy highlighting the new hope to spare carbapenems.
医院感染一直被视为一个重大的健康问题,会导致发病率、死亡率增加以及治疗成本上升。
开展这项回顾性研究旨在分析一种新型抗生素辅助实体(AAE,头孢曲松+舒巴坦+依地酸二钠的组合)与美罗培南联合黏菌素治疗多重耐药(MDR)医院革兰氏阴性菌感染的相对疗效。
本研究纳入了在3年期间(2012年11月至2015年10月)因记录在案的MDR医院革兰氏阴性菌感染而接受AAE或美罗培南联合黏菌素治疗的患者病历。对与临床管理、人口统计学、生命体征和实验室参数以及先前的抗生素治疗、剂量和临床结果相关的数据进行了全面评估,以分析这种新的AAE+黏菌素疗法治疗MDR医院感染的临床益处。
在入围该研究的115例患者中,52例接受了AAE+黏菌素治疗,63例接受了美罗培南+黏菌素治疗。与美罗培南+黏菌素(63.49%)相比,AAE+黏菌素治疗的疗效显著更高(86.53%)。与基于美罗培南的联合治疗的下降趋势相反,基于AAE的联合治疗观察到临床治愈率呈上升趋势。由于碳青霉烯酶增加和病原体多重耐药,美罗培南治疗组在3年期间临床治愈率呈逐步下降趋势,而AAE保持了相同的疗效。
在治疗各种医院MDR革兰氏阴性菌感染方面,与美罗培南+黏菌素相比,AAE+黏菌素疗法显示出更好的细菌学和临床疗效。大量美罗培南治疗失败的患者对AAE疗法有反应,这凸显了节省碳青霉烯类药物的新希望。