Unidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Spain.
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jan 15;54(2):167-74. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir790. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) is an important cause of invasive infections. Alternatives to carbapenems--considered the drugs of choice--are needed because of the emergence of carbapenemase-producing enterobacteria. The efficacy of ß-lactam/ß-lactam inhibitors (BLBLI) in such infections is controversial.
The authors performed a post hoc analysis of patients with bloodstream infections due to ESBL-EC from 6 published prospective cohorts. Mortality and length of hospital stay in patients treated with an active BLBLI (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid [AMC] and piperacillin-tazobactam [PTZ]) or carbapenem were compared in 2 cohorts: the empirical therapy cohort (ETC) and the definitive therapy cohort (DTC). Confounding was controlled by multivariate analysis; for patients in the ETC, a propensity score for receiving carbapenem was also used.
The ETC included 103 patients (BLBLI, 72; carbapenem, 31), and the DTC included 174 (BLBLI, 54; carbapenem, 120). Mortality rates at day 30 for those treated with BLBLI versus carbapenems were 9.7% versus 19.4% for the ETC and 9.3% versus 16.7% for the DTC, respectively (P > .2, log-rank test). After adjustment for confounders, no association was found between either empirical therapy with BLBLI (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], .29-4.40; P = .84) or definitive therapy (adjusted HR, 0.76; 95% CI, .28-2.07; P = .5) and increased mortality. Furthermore, BLBLI therapy, with respect to carbapenem, was not found to influence length of hospital stay.
These results suggest that AMC and PTZ are suitable alternatives to carbapenems for treating patients with bloodstream infections due to ESBL-EC if active in vitro and would be particularly useful as definitive therapy.
产超广谱β-内酰胺酶的大肠埃希菌(ESBL-EC)是引起侵袭性感染的重要原因。由于碳青霉烯酶产生的肠杆菌的出现,需要替代碳青霉烯类药物——被认为是首选药物。在这种感染中,β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺抑制剂(BLBLI)的疗效存在争议。
作者对 6 个已发表的前瞻性队列中由产 ESBL-EC 引起的血流感染患者进行了事后分析。比较了接受活性 BLBLI(阿莫西林-克拉维酸[AMC]和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦[PTZ])或碳青霉烯治疗的患者在 2 个队列中的死亡率和住院时间:经验性治疗队列(ETC)和确定性治疗队列(DTC)。采用多变量分析控制混杂因素;对于 ETC 中的患者,还使用了接受碳青霉烯的倾向评分。
ETC 包括 103 例患者(BLBLI,72 例;碳青霉烯,31 例),DTC 包括 174 例患者(BLBLI,54 例;碳青霉烯,120 例)。接受 BLBLI 治疗与碳青霉烯治疗的患者在第 30 天的死亡率分别为 ETC 的 9.7%和 19.4%,DTC 的 9.3%和 16.7%(P>.2,对数秩检验)。在调整混杂因素后,无论是经验性 BLBLI 治疗(调整后的危险比[HR],1.14;95%置信区间[CI],.29-4.40;P =.84)还是确定性治疗(调整后的 HR,0.76;95%CI,.28-2.07;P =.5)与死亡率增加均无关联。此外,与碳青霉烯相比,BLBLI 治疗并未发现对住院时间有影响。
这些结果表明,如果体外活性良好,AMC 和 PTZ 可替代碳青霉烯类药物用于治疗产 ESBL-EC 的血流感染患者,作为确定性治疗尤其有用。