Suppr超能文献

FOLFIRI方案在老年与非老年转移性结直肠癌或胃癌患者中的疗效与安全性

Efficacy and Safety of FOLFIRI Regimen in Elderly Versus Nonelderly Patients with Metastatic Colorectal or Gastric Cancer.

作者信息

Kim Ji-Won, Lee Keun-Wook, Kim Kyu-Pyo, Lee Ju Hyun, Hong Yong Sang, Kim Jeong-Eun, Kim Sun Young, Park Sook Ryun, Nam Byung-Ho, Cho Sang-Hee, Chung Ik-Joo, Park Young Suk, Oh Ho-Suk, Lee Myung-Ah, Kang Hye Jin, Park Young Iee, Song Eun-Kee, Han Hye Sook, Lee Kyu Taeg, Shin Dong Bok, Kang Jung Hun, Zang Dae Young, Kim Jee Hyun, Kim Tae Won

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2017 Mar;22(3):293-303. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0166. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan-based chemotherapy is a standard backbone of therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) or gastric cancer (GC). However, there is still a paucity of information concerning the efficacy and safety of irinotecan-based regimens in elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the patient cohort ( = 1,545) from the genotype study, we compared the efficacy and safety between elderly and nonelderly patients with metastatic CRC ( = 934) or GC ( = 611) who received first- or second-line FOLFIRI (irinotecan, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Despite lower relative dose intensity in elderly patients, progression-free survival and overall survival were similar between elderly (age ≥70 years) and nonelderly (<70 years) patients in the CRC cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 1.117; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.927-1.345;  = .244, and HR, 0.989; 95% CI, 0.774-1.264;  = .931, respectively) and the GC cohort (HR, 1.093; 95% CI, 0.854-1.400;  = .479, and HR, 1.188; 95% CI, 0.891-1.585;  = .241, respectively). In both cohorts, febrile neutropenia (22.1% vs. 14.6% in CRC cohort and 35.2% vs. 22.5% in GC cohort) and asthenia (grade 3: 8.4% vs. 1.7% in CRC cohort and 5.5% vs. 2.9% in GC cohort) were more frequent in elderly patients. In the CRC cohort, mucositis and anorexia were more frequent in elderly patients. In the GC cohort, nausea and vomiting were less frequent in elderly patients.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of the FOLFIRI regimen was similar between elderly and nonelderly patients in both the CRC and the GC cohorts. However, special attention should be paid to elderly patients because of increased risk for febrile neutropenia and asthenia. 2017;22:293-303 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The efficacy of FOLFIRI (irinotecan, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer or gastric cancer was similar to that in nonelderly patients. However, special attention should be paid to elderly patients because of the increased risk for febrile neutropenia and asthenia. These data suggest that the FOLFIRI regimen could be considered as a standard backbone of therapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer or gastric cancer and that the clinical decision between doublet and singlet chemotherapy may not be based solely on age. However, the data require further assessment of frailty and performance status.

摘要

背景

基于伊立替康的化疗是转移性结直肠癌(CRC)或胃癌(GC)患者治疗的标准主干方案。然而,关于基于伊立替康方案在老年患者中的疗效和安全性的信息仍然匮乏。

患者与方法

利用基因型研究中的患者队列(n = 1545),我们比较了接受一线或二线FOLFIRI(伊立替康、亚叶酸钙和5-氟尿嘧啶)化疗的转移性CRC(n = 934)或GC(n = 611)老年患者和非老年患者的疗效和安全性。

结果

尽管老年患者的相对剂量强度较低,但CRC队列中年龄≥70岁的老年患者与年龄<70岁的非老年患者的无进展生存期和总生存期相似(风险比[HR],1.117;95%置信区间[CI],0.927 - 1.345;P = 0.244,以及HR,0.989;95% CI,0.774 - 1.264;P = 0.931),GC队列中也是如此(HR,1.093;95% CI,0.854 - 1.400;P = 0.479,以及HR,1.188;95% CI,0.891 - 1.585;P = 0.241)。在两个队列中,老年患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症(CRC队列中为22.1%对14.6%,GC队列中为35.2%对22.5%)和乏力(3级:CRC队列中为8.4%对1.7%,GC队列中为5.5%对2.9%)更为常见。在CRC队列中,老年患者口腔炎和厌食更为常见。在GC队列中,老年患者恶心和呕吐较少见。

结论

CRC和GC队列中,老年患者和非老年患者的FOLFIRI方案疗效相似。然而,由于发热性中性粒细胞减少症和乏力风险增加,应特别关注老年患者。2017;22:293 - 303 对实践的启示:FOLFIRI(伊立替康、亚叶酸钙和5-氟尿嘧啶)化疗在老年转移性结直肠癌或胃癌患者中的疗效与非老年患者相似。然而,由于发热性中性粒细胞减少症和乏力风险增加,应特别关注老年患者。这些数据表明,FOLFIRI方案可被视为老年转移性结直肠癌或胃癌患者治疗的标准主干方案,并且双联化疗和单联化疗之间的临床决策可能不应仅基于年龄。然而,这些数据需要对虚弱和体能状态进行进一步评估。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
The early discontinuation of palliative chemotherapy in older patients with cancer.老年癌症患者姑息化疗的过早终止。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Mar;22(3):773-81. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2033-y. Epub 2013 Nov 28.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验